DAFC.net Forum

Forum List | Football Forum

1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 -- 6 -- 7 -- 8 -- [ 9 ] --

Topic: SPFL Prem ~ Celtic 3-1 Hearts FT
161. Author: saltonsgonagetu Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 15:57 Playup_Pompey, Wed 20 May 15:09 "come on "IF" Watch the tv" still yet to see anyone injured/assaulted. plenty with a w@nkrr sign or 2 fingers up as they run passed and a hearts player stamping on a phne dropped by a celtic fan but the "assaults" and "violence" in the stadium didnt happen. The imagines fron trongate/merchant city are seperate and literally any dreg from glasgow/surrounding suburbs were there and would be a gred in their own suburb when celebrating. So fans running on the pitch threatening players and stopping the game being completed , is fine ? Reply
162. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 17:04 saltonsgonagetu, Wed 20 May 15:57 Playup_Pompey, Wed 20 May 15:09 "come on "IF" Watch the tv" still yet to see anyone injured/assaulted. plenty with a w@nkrr sign or 2 fingers up as they run passed and a hearts player stamping on a phne dropped by a celtic fan but the "assaults" and "violence" in the stadium didnt happen. The imagines fron trongate/merchant city are seperate and literally any dreg from glasgow/surrounding suburbs were there and would be a gred in their own suburb when celebrating. So fans running on the pitch threatening players and stopping the game being completed , is fine ? Theres no point in debating it, he will defend them to the hilt 🙄 has already “debunked” the KMI panels decision that Hearts weren’t rewarded a stonewaller v Motherwell….. Reply
163. Author: DBP Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 17:10 I don’t believe play up denied fans ran on the pitch etc… When I read his post, he’s saying there isn’t any video evidence of actual violence/assault that is being claimed Reply
164. Author: Bandy Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 18:03 I don`t think there are any/many actual assaults/violence. But there`s no doubt that the atmosphere was intimidating and Hearts players were justified in feeling unsafe during the pitch invasion. And that in itself is totally unacceptable, irrespective of whether any assaults took place. Reply
165. Author: Connor560 Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 18:13 Knowing one of the lads in the dressing room, 3 were hit - one had to get checked medically. C'mon Ye Pars! Reply
166. Author: par-ticular Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 20:51 Sorry, doesn’t matter whether anyone was hurt or not. Nobody knows what scumbags are on the pitch, their intentions or if they’re carrying weapons. What if Hearts had won the league. Let’s not kid ourselves, this is not the first time Celtic fans have been on the pitch, (in win situation.) As to final whistle blowing, ref may have decided in the interest of safety to get everyone off the pitch asap. Reply
167. Author: jake89 Date: Wed 20th May 2026. 22:06 Worth remembering we did a pitch invasion not so long ago at Greenock. The difference is no-one assaulted players and no-one had to be rushed away to their team bus still in their strips! Reply
168. Author: thebear Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 08:19 Your almost condoning it and stating nothing happened, lots of bits on social media Reply
169. Author: veteraneastender Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 08:31 Spectators should not be on the pitch, it`s as simple as that. Reply
170. Author: Playup_Pompey Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 08:59 "Theres no point in debating it, he will defend them to the hilt 🙄 has already “debunked” the KMI panels decision that Hearts weren’t rewarded a stonewaller v Motherwell….." we are now into day 5 and not 1 person had provided any footage or detail about "assault". Were fans on the pitch YES, should they be there? No, could you excuse 1 or 2 as "exuberance" where the scorer was celebrating? Probably. Kids running on for selfies, adults running on and taking pics of them with kids, handful of idiots looking to wind up opponents following one of the closest title races the country has ever seen. I debunked the KMI panel completely not the specific motherwell vs hearts incident. Its made up of people who are not qualified in laws of the game. If I wanted Kris Boyds opinion i`d tune into sky sports for it not sit for a "panel" to suddenly become factual when they are sharing an opinion Reply
171. Author: thebear Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 09:48 Firstly Shanklin was effectively assaulted Definition Assault is a legal and general term that refers to the act of intentionally or recklessly causing someone to fear immediate and unlawful personal violence, or physically attacking them. Sorry it was assault, and I have seen some vids online of others. Reply
172. Author: CrossPar Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 09:57 Isn`t it bizarre that all this takes place and nothing happens but a manager criticises a referee and he gets banned for 4 games! Reply
173. Author: Bandy Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 11:27 Not bizarre at all. It`s exactly what I expected to happen. Reply
174. Author: doctordandruff Date: Thu 21st May 2026. 11:55 The feeling I was getting was Hearts wanted to just move on, then came O`Neill`s interview.... Reply
175. Author: thebear Date: Fri 22nd May 2026. 11:33 Well Martin O`Neil does not know the law he is pig ignorant about what happened. Also ref did stop match early as agreed with hearts due to player safety. Sorry could not get link to work https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c4gv02e4p5jo Reply

1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 -- 6 -- 7 -- 8 -- [ 9 ] --

Post your Reply

Your Message:

By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone

- - -