DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Football Forum

Topic: Amade booking..possible penalty?
1. Author:  Bandy        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 11:11

Anyone else think we had a justified penalty claim when Amade got booked for dissent?

Kane was half free in the box..the rovers player made a great tackle and the ball broke to someone (not sure who) who blasted it over.

But after he shot a rovers player came in late and caught him high, and hard, on the ankle...a foul, and at least a booking, anywhere else on the pitch.

Do fouls like that not count when someone is shooting? Noone on the commentary made anything of it, and the incident wasn`t shown again, but it looked a stonewaller to me

Reply
2. Author:  Rusty Shackleford        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 11:22

Bandy, Sat 23 Aug 11:11

Anyone else think we had a justified penalty claim when Amade got booked for dissent?

Kane was half free in the box..the rovers player made a great tackle and the ball broke to someone (not sure who) who blasted it over.

But after he shot a rovers player came in late and caught him high, and hard, on the ankle...a foul, and at least a booking, anywhere else on the pitch.

Do fouls like that not count when someone is shooting? Noone on the commentary made anything of it, and the incident wasn`t shown again, but it looked a stonewaller to me


Yeah. By that time I was resigned to the ref being a complete moron.

Reply
3. Author:  Taxipar        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 11:35

Listen we got what we deserved out that game but that referee blatantly favoured Raith 100% a sending off for Stevenson definitely a penalty shout. Every time a Raith player took a throw in it was 10 yard farther forward , every time we got a throw in he told us to get back 😡

A par since 1985

Reply
4. Author:  JimDAFC        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 11:47

I would also like another look at the header Mullen missed which I am sure that a Raith defender was pulling at his shirt which might have been enough to make him mistime his header which he should have scored from.



Reply
5. Author:  Dave_1885        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 11:51

I mind Scotland got a penalty v Israel for exactly the same thing. Gilmour? Blazed a shot over but was taken late and was given.

Scottish refs are just terrible.

Stevenson red, Easton falling over and fouling for fun, not one booking for Rovers dissent but Gilmour booked instantly, Byrne rolling back onto the pitch when injured, throw ins going the wrong way or both looking utterly oblivious and guessing……

But thats just what to expect as the refs in this country are a joke.

Reply
6. Author:  Ahoy!Ahoy!        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 12:21

Easton got a chat too early on for his fouling, 5mins later he fouls again NO BOOKING. Constantly mouthing off to the ref etc…

Ref was one of the worst I’ve seen for a while, we got nothing last night.

That’s not an excuse though as we got exactly what we deserved last night with the overall performance.



Reply
7. Author:  Indiapar1        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 14:23

When we don`t test the keeper, you don`t deserve anything from the game unfortunately.

I thought Raith gambled in the first 60 minutes ie try to score and hang on. Their substitutions in the last 20 minutes were more about legs than tactical changes.

G Wardrope

Reply
8. Author:  Par        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 14:47

We did not deserve to win the game as it turned out, but a draw would have been fair.

Mistake by Mullen and weak goalkeeping from Munn cost us.

But the referee was poor, Stevenson should have been off, he let Rovers off with fouling and we could have had a penalty.

How many headers with good goal scoring opportunities has Mullen missed this season, he could have had 3 or 4 goals, hopefully working on this as he does get in good positions.



Reply
9. Author:  Milos Drizzle        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 15:44

JimDAFC, Sat 23 Aug 11:47

I would also like another look at the header Mullen missed which I am sure that a Raith defender was pulling at his shirt which might have been enough to make him mistime his header which he should have scored from.


This. Quite clearly having his shirt/shorts pulled. Didn’t claim for it, or play-acted, which is refreshing.

This is my signature

Reply
10. Author:  pacifist        
Date: Sat 23rd Aug 2025. 16:19

Defo penalty but he should have claimed for it.



Reply
Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -