| Topic: Highlights on YouTube |
|---|
| 21. Author: Indiapar1 Date: Mon 2nd Nov 2026. 07:57 wee eck, Sun 1 Nov 18:54 We were behind the goals so got a good view of the penalty. Tgat was our view at the time and the highlights confirmed it. It was a soft penalty, we wasn`t going to score, and the ball was probably going to run out for a goal kick. Donnelly just got on the wrong side of the player. Tod had a similar circumstance. Had he gone to ground it should also have been a penalty G Wardrope Post Edited (Mon 02 Nov 08:01) Reply |
| 22. Author: NMCmassive Date: Mon 2nd Nov 2026. 08:15 da_no_1, Sun 1 Nov 21:25 You bash on yourself 👍🏻 COYP Post Edited (Mon 02 Nov 08:15) Reply |
| 23. Author: NMCmassive Date: Mon 2nd Nov 2026. 08:16 wee eck, Sun 1 Nov 21:21 What year is it? 1926? Naw, it was a child COYP Reply |
| 24. Author: wee eck Date: Mon 2nd Nov 2026. 08:21 Having watched the tug on Izak`s shirt in Liverpool v Arsenal being judged as no foul I`d say the interpretation of a foul inside the box is just a lottery now. Thanks for commenting on the game, Indiapar. I see now I shouldn`t have mentioned the subbed players or the Trump look-alike. I thought fans would have been more interested in what we`ve been craving on here all season - G-O-A-L-S!!! Reply |