DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Off Topic

Topic: Virginia Giuffre
1. Author:  Berry        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 08:31

Has died aged 41, to suicide.

The cynic in me suggests there’s more to this than the news is reporting, given her comments, awful convenient.

Reply
2. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 10:23

Well she has recently separated from her husband, lost custody of her children and has had restraining orders placed against her. It would be a bit late to silence her now after she has given testimony and the cases she was involved in have been settled. It seems, quite understandably, that she was a troubled soul and now has the peace she could never find in life.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
3. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 11:09

A few weeks ago it was reported that she had been seriously injured in a car accident and was unlikely to recover from her injuries but police subsequently disputed the severity of the crash.



Reply
4. Author:  buffy        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 11:26

Medical staff at the clinic where she was treated also disputed her claims of “only a few days to live.”

Australian police advised it was a minor accident and her carer’s car only suffered a rear broken tail light.

”Buffy’s Buns are the finest in Fife”, J. Spence 2019”

Reply
5. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 11:42

I don`t blame her for panicking about being in a car accident.

The context of being a traumatised woman being hounded for exposing a unflattering truth about the Royal Family would have put her into a paranoid state.

She had posted on social media that she had no intention of killing herself and that we shouldn`t believe any apparent suicide. This was six years ago, and a lot has happened since then, but it does give an insight into her thinking at the time.

Her life was pretty tragic right from the start. When she was 14 her dad got her a job at Mar a Lago, where he was a maintenance manager. That`s where she met Maxwell, who offered her a job as a masseuse with Epstein, which in turn led to her being abused in the ways that we all know about, by some of the most powerful men on the planet.

She deserves huge credit for exposing what went on and it`s incredibly sad that she died with so many of her abusers still walking free and enjoying life.

The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.

Reply
6. Author:  red-star-par        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 12:01

Very sad indeed. Groomed from childhood and sex trafficked to be sexually abused by the rich and powerful, then having the trauma of standing up to her abusers.

Andrew Windsor gave her £12,000,000 of the money his family has stolen from our country and everyone knows why, but he still lives a life of privilege

Reply
7. Author:  veteraneastender        
Date: Sat 26th Apr 2025. 13:35

The One Who Knocks, Sat 26 Apr 10:23

Well she has recently separated from her husband, lost custody of her children and has had restraining orders placed against her. It would be a bit late to silence her now after she has given testimony and the cases she was involved in have been settled. It seems, quite understandably, that she was a troubled soul and now has the peace she could never find in life.


Would be interesting to know what caused her family rift. Sounds like heavy duty issues.

Reply
8. Author:  PARrot        
Date: Sun 27th Apr 2025. 22:17

red-star-par, Sat 26 Apr 12:01

Very sad indeed. Groomed from childhood and sex trafficked to be sexually abused by the rich and powerful, then having the trauma of standing up to her abusers.

Andrew Windsor gave her £12,000,000 of the money his family has stolen from our country and everyone knows why, but he still lives a life of privilege


They havent stolen s penny from us.
Just make the valid point without the added seasoning.



Reply
9. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Mon 28th Apr 2025. 18:30

If their money came from their gangster grandad going into chippies and saying "nice gaff you got here, be a shame if something happened to it", then I think it`d be reasonable to say that that family lived off the proceeds of theft?

So is it somehow different because the same theft (only with folk`s farms and livestock) happened in the more distant past? How many generations does it take to clean dirty money?

Unless i`ve picked you up wrong and you are asking RSP to be specific with their language then, yes, technically the Royal Family is merely guilty of recieving the proceeds of extortion.



Post Edited (Mon 28 Apr 18:31)

Reply
Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -