| Topic: Grok AI and sexual images |
|---|
| 21. Author: ipswichpar Date: Sun 11th Jan 2026. 06:24 Wow.... so a bloke in a bikini is the same as sexualised images of kids?!? The whole issue is that X initially refused to make the change. It was only when Ofcom put pressure on them (in its normal delayed and way too soft way of applying regulation) that this was changed so that it was prevented for non paid users. Which then leads to a few further questions.... 1. How does the fact it is available to paid users when it is not correct to be a available to unpaid users make it regulatory compliant? 2. If the tool can generate such pictures, can it be sure that it does not use illegal images as part of its training data? 3. Why do you think that any user activity absolves providers like X or Grok or network providers from their obligations under the Online Security Act? Reply |
| 22. Author: P Date: Sun 11th Jan 2026. 08:46 NMCmassive, Sat 10 Jan 22:55 Highest profile example is bikini requests on Nell Fisher from Stranger Things aged 12 or 13 but there are many other complaints about naked children - you reckon you’re some sort Trump and can just shout ‘false news’ and facts stop being facts? Post Edited (Sun 11 Jan 08:48) Reply |
| 23. Author: NMCmassive Date: Sun 11th Jan 2026. 13:40 ipswichpar, Sun 11 Jan 06:24 1. A paid up user has to give over their information. If they break C T&C’s they loose their account. If they break the law they’re at risk of police charges. Obviously not fool proof but a much more stringent than the free for all that happened. It’s back to OF girls. 2. The function that was being abused was a function of change my clothes. My wife had daughter were using it the first time I knew about it. It started off with OFGirls and then some idiots used it on different celebrities. I don’t know anything about the programming off AI but I’m pretty certain the intention of the developers isn’t for it to be used for indecent images of women who haven’t requested it themselves or children. Before this event/controversy you couldn’t make sexual images. Basically images showing someone’s bits. That’s why it’s all bikini pictures. 3. I’m not saying any user activity absolves chatGPT, Gemini, Grok, X, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram or any other platforms (the focus is on X now but it won’t stay there. If they can ban X, they can ban any of them. This isn’t about X. It’s about social media platforms in general. I know some folk can’t see past Elon musk but, if they take the time to think about it - its be mark zuckerburg and Jay Graber next. Then it’ll be forums like this) from their obligations however you can’t treat the platform like an individual. The platform is providing a service. Yes I think the platforms need have controls in place and be shown to be pro-active in their stance against certain topics be it CP/extremism/incitements to violence but I also think that individuals should be held accountable for their actions on that platform rather than always just blaming the platform. The politicians here have a knack of blaming major tech companies atm. They were more than happy to welcome Alaa Abd El-Fattah after all his racist anti-white/calls to violence against white people/anti-semetism. Its rules for thee but not for mee… COYP Reply |
| 24. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Mon 12th Jan 2026. 11:50 Ofcom to investigate wether or not Grok allows for sexualised deepfakes or indecent images of children to be created by its interface. Musk says the UK Government will look for “any excuse at censorship”. Make of it what you will…… Reply |
| 25. Author: ipswichpar Date: Mon 12th Jan 2026. 11:56 Good. Whether they will do much about it is another matter.... Reply |
| 26. Author: buffy Date: Wed 14th Jan 2026. 13:25 Breaking news on BBC “The Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he has been informed that Elon Musk`s X is "acting to ensure full compliance with UK law" over sexualised deepfakes produced by its AI tool, Grok.” Story being updated ”Buffy’s Buns are the finest in Fife”, J. Spence 2019” Reply |