Forum List | Politics Forum
Start Previous 1 -- [ 2 ] -- 3 -- Next End| Topic: Aid to Ukraine |
|---|
| 21. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Tue 30th Apr 2024. 05:23 As for the current Ukraine situation, I genuinely can`t understand why Oz seemingly wants Russia to win. Turning a blind eye to blatant military aggression is an extremely dangerous precedent to set. All this will do is embolden Putin and encourage Xi to take a pop at Taiwan which will basically destroy the electronics industry worldwide and also invoke a war between the US (maybe the Quad) and China. As for reading multiple News sources, it`s very clear that a lot of the narratives Oz is stating are coming from the Kremlin via Tass. It`s fine to consider the Russian narrative, but there is certainly very little factuality of what comes out of Russian media. Personally, I would criticise the European NATO countries for not mobilising their industry to produce the required ammunition for the Ukrainians. That said, Estonia and Czech have found 1Mn and 1.5Mn 155mm shells respectively which they plan to purchase and send to Ukraine. Frankly, the Western European countries missed an opportunity to listen to the former Warsaw Pact and Soviet block countries who had been warning about the threat of Russia for years. Germany in particular needs to do some proper soul searching and realise that "leading Europe" also includes being a military power. The first thing that will happen will be that efforts will be made to stabilise the line. The Ukrainians have performed something of a miracle to hold what they have over the last few months while the Republicans failed to put their big boy pants on. They still have the advantage at Sea and have largely neutralised the Russian Black Sea Fleet and Russia simply doesn`t have the capabilities in the air, otherwise they`d have been able to do much more to neautralise the convoys of military gear coming in from Poland and elsewhere. Giving the Ukranians Air Power is vital going forward if there is to be a move from positional warfare and proper use of NATO combined-arms warfare. At this stage, I have to praise Macron for actually taking the initiative and calling out Putin. I think its far more likely that we will see NATO troops in Ukraine in support roles and potentially guarding the Belarussian border along with a No-fly zone. There simply is no excuse for not putting this in place after the action that was taken during the Iran drone attack on Israel. Outside of the battle on the ground it appears that there are still efforts ongoing to use Russian sovereign assets to pay for weapons for the Ukrainians. It also appears that the US is considering sanctions on China for supplying tooling equipment to the Russians which is helping military production. I would hope the EU would follow suit with this as this would really turn the screw on Xi. Reply |
| 22. Author: OzPar Date: Wed 1st May 2024. 05:52 As for the current Ukraine situation, I genuinely can`t understand why Oz seemingly wants Russia to win. Turning a blind eye to blatant military aggression is an extremely dangerous precedent to set. === Oh dear, HJ, where do we start? I want to clarify that I do not want Russia to win. However, I believe it`s important to address the perception that I am turning a blind eye to military aggression. We have been down this road several times before, HJ. It is like arguing that the conflict in the Middle East started on October 7. You know very well that Russia was provoked into action in Ukraine. NATO`s efforts to bring Ukraine into play were a red rag to the bull. We don’t have to go through all those events and issues again. They should be taken as read. === As for reading multiple News sources, it`s very clear that a lot of the narratives Oz is stating are coming from the Kremlin via Tass. It`s fine to consider the Russian narrative, but there is certainly very little factuality of what comes out of Russian media. === This is not the case. As I have repeatedly pointed out, the Western narrative – or at least, the NATO narrative - is distorted and, in large part, completely untrue. For two years, we were fed the line that Ukraine was winning, and it is fair to say that they were for a while. The Russians were slow to adjust to the new form of warfare that used unmanned drones, and they took a hell of a beating in the Black Sea and on the front lines. The Russians` nadir came when Prigozhin led his private army, the Wagner Group, up the freeway towards Moscow. Whatever Putin said to Prigozhin that night proved to be the turning point in the conflict. Since then, things have pretty much all gone Putin’s way. Don’t be fooled by this new injection of money. As I said at the beginning of this thread, it’s a sleight of hand by politicians to redistribute public money around the States, with a small proportion being used to fund what is left of a corrupt government in Kyiv. We’ve seen all this before. Remember Afghanistan? Who was the Afghani leader straight out of Hollywood central casting? Hamid Karzai. Anointed by the USA to act as a puppet for the USA. And when the time was right, dumped by the USA. Here’s Ukraine, with its leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, literally right out of central casting—an actor who played the president becoming the president. Right now, the USA is fattening his pockets in preparation for a swift and stealthy escape. But his days as the darling of the West are fast running out. Putin has said he would never kill the leader of another nation while in office. However, on May 20, Zelenskyy’s period in office officially ends. He has cancelled elections due to the ongoing war, but that is not going to stop Putin from sending in an assassination squad if he wants to. For as far as Putin is concerned, Zelenskyy will then be an illegitimate leader. The much-vaunted Ukrainian offensive turned out to be a disaster, and four provinces in the east joined Crimea in being forever lost to Russia. The question now is, when will Ukraine surrender? The sooner, the better; if they don’t, four more provinces will disappear, and Ukraine’s wheat will not have access to Odessa port on the Black Sea. Last week, 8,000 Ukrainian soldiers were lost, while the Russians added 100,000 newly trained recruits. Ukraine just does not have the numbers. This war should have ended months ago, but rest assured it will end soon. As things stand, Zelenskyy would do well to get out of Dodge before May 20. None of this information was sourced in Russia. Post Edited (Wed 01 May 05:57) Reply |
| 23. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Wed 1st May 2024. 16:09 Oz, that last post really makes you look like the Marjorie Taylor-Green of dotnet. As I said, literally everything you have said is a narrative that has originated in the Kremlin and is being circulated by the Russian state media and disinformation apparatus. The narrative that "The US aid is pointless because the war is unwinnable for the Ukrainians" is one that appears in cycles when the Ukrainians appear to be struggling. It appeared in the beginning when we were hearing that the Ukrainians would "fold within days". Do you honestly believe that the corruption in Ukraine is worse than in Russia? Claim this is whitabootery if you like, but if that is the case then you really need to do a bit more research and look at how Russia actually operates and ask the question why Russia doesn`t match the likes of Poland in terms or economic performance and development. You`re certainly not stupid and have said that you have worked with media in the past. With that in mind, why are you doing a Sammer and peddling a narrative that you are likely quite aware comes from the Kremlin if you do not want the Russians to win? As I`ve stated previously, the Ukrainian struggles on land are well documented and are really caused by the lack of air power as it severely hinders the ability to conduct combined arms operations. This has resulted in the use of more assault-type tactics which are more risky and it is thought that these are much of the reason that the Abrams tanks were withdrawn from the front line last week. Basically, you`re taking the approach of "Oh, it failed" without actually looking into the detail - which is, unfortunately, the approach of many these days - and one of the reasons that the likes of Orban and Trump are able to get away with the lies that they spread. You seem unable or unwilling to properly analyse the military situation. Quite a few sources are stating that the Ukrainian weapons supplies have been in trickles for about a year and that much of the promised aid has been slow or not arrived yet. If you think the Russians have the military superiority on land, then I would ask you why the Ukrainians have managed to largely hold the lines? Particularly when they`ve been rationing artillery munitions and are only able to fire about 1 round for every 10 from the Russians and this has been the case for a few months.This rather contradicts your notion that the Ukrainians aren`t up for the fight or that Russian "might" means that resistance is pointless. Also, let`s see a source for that claim of 8,000 military deaths on the Ukrainian side last week. Searching key words "Ukraine War" "8000 Casualties" on Ground News brings up articles on Mariupol and pre-war articles on the conflict since 2015 but nothing dated April 2024. Those mentioned are also civilian casualties not military. Are you at all familiar with the quality of the Russian military training? Particularly under the current circumstances? The cla Reply |
| 24. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Wed 1st May 2024. 16:09 The claims about Putin not wanting to kill Zelensky while he held an election mandate are simply deluded to the point of hilarity. How long do you think Putin has legitimately held power in Russia? Putin needed the war to move focus away from his corruption and this is a tactic that was used to cement his power in 2000 with Chechnya and then again in 2008 with Georgia when the Russian opposition was starting to gain momentum and uncovering systematic cronyism and corruption. Make no mistake, when you claim that the "Western and NATO narrative is distorted and completely untrue" and that "Putin was provoked by NATO", you are simply cementing your status as another "Useful idiot". Reply |
| 25. Author: OzPar Date: Fri 3rd May 2024. 07:42 PART ONE At its best, journalism is applied research; at its worst, it is propaganda. When producing a story, a journalist should aim to answer six fundamental questions: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY. It is as simple as that, but these days, that last question, WHY, is often ignored. What is most concerning is that frequently, it is deliberately ignored, and inevitably, the result is propaganda. Pursuing clicks and views can sometimes overshadow the commitment to genuine inquiry in the current media landscape. The WHY behind a story is the key to understanding motives, context, and consequences. However, it is often pushed aside in favour of sensationalism or reinforcing preconceived narratives. This is why I emphasise the merit of examining an issue from all points of the compass: to answer the question WHY, to establish context, the bedrock upon which accurate and insightful research is built. When I read your critique of my comments on the war in Ukraine, I was taken by your observation that my remarks are simply a recycling of a Kremlin narrative rather than a balanced assessment of the situation from a neutral perspective. As an Australian, I have no skin in the game. Why would I wish to support Russia? Just as what is happening in Gaza did not begin on October 7, the Ukraine situation did not start in February 2022. For the sake of fairness, HJ, here`s the context as I see it: In 1990, Gorbachev received assurances from the USA that NATO would not advance eastwards. However, under Clinton, three nations joined NATO. In 2007, under Bush Jr., seven more joined the group. At that point, Putin said, "Stop, no more". But in February 2014, the United States participated in a regime change operation overthrowing a Ukrainian president who wanted neutrality, Viktor Yanukovych. At that moment, Putin said you`re not getting our naval base in Crimea and took back Crimea because he was not going to let it fall into NATO hands. The ethnic Russian part of the eastern Donbas was shocked at the Russophobic regime that had come into power with the US connivance, and it required two treaties, Minsk 1 and 2, to avert a civil war. The idea of the Minsk 2 agreement was that the eastern part of Ukraine, which is ethnically overwhelmingly Russian, would have autonomy within a federal Ukraine. However, the United States and the Ukrainian government opposed federalisation. By the time Biden came in in 2021, the Minsk agreements had fallen apart, and the US was arming Ukraine to the teeth. Biden came in in full cold warrior mode, pledging he would expand NATO to Ukraine—that upset Putin. On December 17, 2021, Putin put on the table a draft US-Russia security agreement based on NATO not enlarging into Ukraine with missiles being pointed at Russia, but Biden rejected that. (Continued...) Post Edited (Fri 03 May 07:44) Reply |
| 26. Author: OzPar Date: Fri 3rd May 2024. 07:46 PART TWO So, when applying this context to the current war, you could reasonably characterise it as occurring in the eighth year of a dispute that started with the overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych and escalated when Biden refused to negotiate with Putin in December 2021. Within a few days of the launch of Russia`s so-called "special military operation", in early March 2022, Zelensky went to the negotiating table with Turkish mediators. He reassured Russia that Ukraine could be neutral but would need security guarantees. They were making tremendous progress, according to insider accounts. But, as we all know, Boris Johnson, acting on behalf of Biden, stepped in to tell Zelensky, you don`t need to negotiate, you need to defeat Russia, you don`t need to accept neutrality, we`ve got your back. And so, this bloodbath commenced. History will not be kind to Biden and Johnson. Suppose you were to seek some actual context rather than rely on a mishmash of press releases from NATO officials and military hardware companies. In that case, you might pick up on reports from Reuters saying Ukraine is outnumbered, outgunned, and ground down by relentless Russian advances. As the war progresses through its third year, the Ukrainian army is 30-40% smaller than it was. The rest have been killed, wounded, or signed off for various reasons, such as old age or illness. They are exhausted, and the army cannot recruit enough soldiers to fill the gaps. The 8,000 losses (not "casualties") I mentioned last week were not all deaths; they included many troops withdrawing of their own volition from the front lines. Morale is falling. As you have acknowledged, Ukraine has an arms supply issue and does not have air superiority. The bulk of the money approved by the US Congress will go towards replenishing dwindling US stocks, not the Ukraine frontlines. Any sensible assessment of the situation points to this ugly game being over. Context. It is all about context. From where I sit, given the vast and oh-so-unnecessary losses, any victory will very much be a pyrrhic victory. Reply |
| 27. Author: Andrew283 Date: Fri 3rd May 2024. 12:27 It`s like a battle of TLDR here currently Reply |
| 28. Author: OzPar Date: Fri 3rd May 2024. 13:18 Alas, not all subjects lend themselves to brevity. :) Reply |
| 29. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Sat 4th May 2024. 01:39 Oz - Frankly, most of your historical points are rather...skewed. And a number of them, I`ve been over with Sammer before. The point about Russia "being assured that NATO would not expand Eastward" was something I researched quite a lot around the outbreak of the war. By happenstance, At the time I was studying two courses at Lund University, one on the relationship of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia and another that was with similar focus on the Visegrad countries. This is the former if you`re curious https://www.sol.lu.se/en/course/ockb14/vt2024/. I mentioned this very point to the teacher (Niklas Bernsand - https://www.sol.lu.se/en/person/niklasbernsand/ ) who is very often on Swedish TV and involved in advising the Swedish Government and his answer was that this was something mooted to the Russians in negotiations and taken back to those with the decision-making power only to be rejected by George HW Bush, John Major and Francois Mitterand because it would undermine the sovereignty of the former Warsaw Pact and newly-independent Soviet states. This account is reiterated by several sources if you research it. The claim that this was formally offered is a false narrative being pushed by the Kremlin. NATO is a voluntary organisation and all of the nations joining CHOSE to join. What does it tell you that pretty much EVERY former Warsaw Pact / ex-Soviet Block nation has made the choice to join NATO? Could it perhaps be something to do with being familiar with being "under the Russian Soviet jackboot"? The claims of a "Russophobic" regime in Ukraine is also rather fanciful and most definitely a narrative peddled by the Kremlin. Only 17% of the pre-war population of Ukraine are/were "ethnically Russian", while 31% considered Russian as their first language. The reason for this disparity was the Brezhnev doctrines which basically forced Russian language on the entire Soviet Union, whereas before under Lenin, Stalin and Kruschev every citizen had the right to conduct their business with the state in their native tongue. Essentially, this created a hierarchy of ethnicities within the Union with the Russians at the top and it essentially restored the Soviet Union to being the "Russian Empire". I`d recommend you read about it in this paper: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2501300. As for the more modern context, Ukrainian Governance tended to swing between pro-European and Pro-Russian from 1990 onwards. There was NEVER language policy in Ukraine until the Yanukovych`s Party of Regions introduced it. Ukrainian and Russian were used interchangably even in the same conversation. Funnily enough, the PoR`s claim that this was to "protect the rights of minorities in Ukraine" didn`t extend to affording the ethnic Hungarians in the West the same language rights. Go figure! Conclusion: the introduction of language policy was a plot to undermine the establishment of the Ukrainian state. Post Edited (Sat 04 May 01:39) Reply |
| 30. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Sat 4th May 2024. 02:04 I am actually quite aware of the situation on the ground. As I said, the weapons deliveries have been in trickles for the last year and the rationing of munitions that has been ongoing for months has affected morale. However, if there was the collapse that you claim then I very much doubt the Ukrainians would have held as much land as they have. If the weapons supplies appeared to be slowing, would you really expect young Ukrainians to jump in droves to join the army? Somehow I don`t think so. It appears though that Zelensky is finally making moves to get this sorted. Zelensky made a huge error by not listening to Zaluzhny regarding conscription and this lost them much time and allowed the Russians to gain momentum. Likewise, he hasn`t allowed members of the opposition parties to travel abroad and help rally for the cause, which has apparently cost him in the public opinion polls. Support for continuing the war does however remain strong. Criticism should absolutely be directed at the NATO nations regarding their support. The Germans should hang their heads in shame over the dithering with the Leopard II and the Americans also should have been far faster with the F16. Had the Ukrainians had these weapons when they retook Kharkiv then they likely could have pushed the Russians out of a larger chunk of the Donbas. Funny that you mention the claim about Boris Johnson supposedly sabotaging peace talks, as I read this article fairly recently which basically states that both sides were willing to negotiate but were VERY far apart on a number of issues. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/22/boris-johnson-ukraine-2022-peace-talks-russia. As it stands, there is no other appropriate security guarantee for Ukraine against Russian aggression than to become a full member of NATO. It would also appear that the EU is ready to push to get Ukraine in and somehow, I can`t see Hungary or Slovakia being able to resist when their economies are dependent on the EU redistribution of funds. Quite a few countries are also making moves to unilaterally support Ukraine and avoid the lengthy processes of the EU - the UK just approved £3Bn in annual support and I wouldn`t be surprised to see Macron follow with something similar. As I said previously, NATO troops in supporting roles and a no-fly zone within Ukraine are much more likely now as there appears to be a collective desire to embarrass Putin and discourage Xi. Funnily enough, you`ve sidestepped the question on corruption in Russia which is quite understandable because it truly is at incredible levels. The narrative on the casualties also changed rather dramatically. Reply |
| 31. Author: The One Who Knocks Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 10:46 A hospital decimated by a Russian missile strike this week and China sending troops to Belarus. Partners without limits indeed. And although my eyes were open They just might as well be closed Reply |
| 32. Author: Luxembourg Par Date: Tue 10th Sep 2024. 09:52 Ukraine now hitting Moscow with drones. War is different when it’s on your own doorstep, isn’t it Mr Putin? Is this leading to further escalation? Or maybe pressure at home to find a solution?  Reply |
| 33. Author: Buspasspar Date: Fri 18th Oct 2024. 17:01 From Aunty .. yet to be confirmed https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3vkqwe9wwdo Can only be for the worst We are forever shaped by the Children we once were Reply |
| 34. Author: red-star-par Date: Fri 18th Oct 2024. 20:25 Yep, Ukraine is shafted now. The US got the actor the President Job, got him to poke the bear, promising the back up, and now they are going to leave the country in the lurch and concentrate on backing Israel. Hopefully America gets what it deserves, it`s being carrying out war by proxy for decades Reply |
| 35. Author: OzPar Date: Fri 18th Oct 2024. 21:38 Yes, red-star-par, it is and has been an absolute obscenity. But we have continued to mindlessly fund this folly and keep the conflict going even though it was lost the best part of a year ago. So many dead, and for what? So that Russia could take 20% of Ukraine`s land mass? So that mainland Europe could face another winter without gas heating thanks to an American plot to blow up an essential pipeline in the Baltic Sea? So that Zelenskyy and his colleagues can walk away with hundreds of millions of dollars in their pockets to fund a cocaine-sniffing lifestyle in luxury villas on the shores of the Mediterranean? We all know that Putin is no angel, but as a Russian leader, he was morally correct in standing his ground. This was all about the US, through its proxies in NATO, poking the bear until it had to respond. Three years on, and hundreds of thousands dead, the war will end soon. Russia will win, but it will be a pyrrhic victory. Shareholders in the military-industrial complex are the only winners here. And a disgustingly high proportion of them will be politicians and those well-paid puppets who constantly appeared in our media claiming Ukraine`s victory was just around the corner - if only they could get this weapon or that... Reply |
| 36. Author: red-star-par Date: Fri 18th Oct 2024. 22:35 Exactly OzPar, the only winners from this are those that are profiting from the aid, by the time palms are greased, shareholders are paid, the remaining aid to pay for bombs at £500,000 a time won`t last long Reply |
| 37. Author: The One Who Knocks Date: Fri 18th Oct 2024. 22:44 Red Star, Russia invaded Ukraine five years before Zelenskyy became president. And although my eyes were open They just might as well be closed Reply |
| 38. Author: jake89 Date: Fri 18th Oct 2024. 23:25 Where`s Sammer? Reply |
| 39. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Sun 20th Oct 2024. 18:36 Sammer is most likely in the Gulag for connecting to websites run by "foreign agents" according to Russia`s national security laws, despite being a fervent supporter of the Ruscists. Poetic. The claims about the Ukrainian Presidential election of 2019 are quite interesting, particularly if you consider the results in the Eastern and Southern Oblasts. If the Americans had the intent of "installing" Zelensky or taking a concrete stance on Ukraine, would they not have picked somebody who was Ethnically Ukrainian rather than a Russian-speaking Jew? Seems a bit pointless when the previous incumbent, Petro Poroshenko, was an ethnic Ukrainian and EU- and US-friendly. I think most would struggle to find the basis for a conspiracy there! Quite frankly, 12,000 (or 20,000 as some sources are saying) inexperienced North Korean troops will make very little difference to what`s currently going on - the Russians are losing that amount in the space of a few weeks. Moreover, it should say something about the Russian war effort that they`re having to call on the North Koreans for help with boots on the ground. Interestingly, it also gives NATO member states a pretext on which they could enter Ukraine. My Russian pals are telling me that there are adverts in the Metros in various cities around the country offering salaries of 50K USD to join the Russian armed forces, which is an ridiculously high salary and highlight the manpower shortages they`re having. Without a general mobilisation, which the Russian public would never accept, Putin is only succeeding in building a debt mountain. The Ukrainians have been hurting the Russians pretty badly on the ammunition front recently with precision strikes, hence why Putin has been upping the nuclear doctrine rhetoric which he does whenever he`s feeling the pressure. Can`t blame him when his 3 day Special military operation has now been going on for about 900 days. He has a history of starting conflicts when he`s under pressure though...Chechnya...Georgia...Ukraine. It really does amaze me how many folk like to make grand statements about the military situation with next to no knowledge of warfare or weaponry. After Harris wins on November 5th, we`ll quite likely hear that Biden has authorised long ranges strikes within Russia, a day or two after the fact. The F16 training program is well underway and is making quite a difference to air defence already and operations will shift to the offensive when more arrive next year - you literally have to learn to fly a completely different way between Soviet and Western Aircraft. The Russian navy is largely neutralised. The only thing that is really at a stalemate or even slightly in the Russians` favour is the land war. As for Oz calling Putin "morally correct", its just laughable but not unexpected with the level of conspiracy theory that he has espoused in recent times. Must be a fun game spreading lies that enable tyrants and start wars when you`re of a generat Reply |
| 40. Author: OzPar Date: Mon 21st Oct 2024. 00:28 Your deranged and uninformed rants say everything about you. Reply |
Post your Reply
Your Message:
By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -