Topic: Starmer |
---|
1. Author: desparado Date: Sun 20th Apr 2025. 23:55 Well it’s all out now. How long has he got? What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
2. Author: The One Who Knocks Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 00:28 Care to elaborate? And although my eyes were open They just might as well be closed Reply |
3. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 10:00 Whats out? 🤔 Reply |
4. Author: desparado Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 10:11 Lord Alli and Starmer are or were in a relationship. Rumored months ago and story was going to break but he brought out a super injunction to muzzle the press. It’s on Twitter x. Lord Alli contributed millions to the Labour Party whilst having an affair with Starmer. He is without doubt compromised. All of the above are allegations but this story has been doing the rounds for a wee while now. What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
5. Author: P Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 10:15 Source Jim Davidson (yes the old comedian) - sounds legit 😆 Reply |
6. Author: desparado Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 10:36 My gut feeling ? It’s ligit alright. It will all unravel sooner rather than later. What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
7. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 12:19 It all comes out the closet sooner or later. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
8. Author: Parboiled Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 13:07 …..when did you? Reply |
9. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 13:21 Parboiled, Mon 21 Apr 13:07 Pi5h patter. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
10. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 13:41 desparado, Mon 21 Apr 10:11 Sourcing X isn’t exactly giving you the right back up 😂 Reply |
11. Author: Parboiled Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 15:05 He once said 99% of women don’t have a penis. He’s a prick Reply |
12. Author: Parboiled Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 15:12 And Swinney can’t define what a woman is…or is just too terrified to do so. Post Edited (Mon 21 Apr 15:13) Reply |
13. Author: desparado Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 17:13 Topic Originator: Parboiled Date: Mon 21 Apr 15:12 And Swinney can’t define what a woman is…or is just too terrified to do so. Deflection. The topic is about the rumours surrounding Starmer……it’s more than rumours and he won’t be able to keep a lid on it for too long. Mind you it’s par for the course for Unionists as I have lost count in recent months how many have been caught out for being involved in criminality, corruption, being sex pests, sexual abusers and nonces. Red Tories and Blue Tories are rife with them. Must be something to do with their public school system where being abused is regarded as normal. You are obviously annoyed with yourself for voting for Starmers mob, boy what a mug eh ? What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
14. Author: jake89 Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 17:56 Absolute drivel thread. Reply |
15. Author: ipswichpar Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 18:00 Probably the most appropriate username in the world. Reply |
16. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 18:10 jake89, Mon 21 Apr 17:56 Only thing I can find is a AI likely youtube video claiming theres some CCTV footage about it. Nothing from Jim Davidson the reported source of it all. 100% drivel that desperado has fallen for. Reply |
17. Author: P Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 20:11 Grok ; As of April 20, 2025, the claims regarding alleged CCTV footage showing UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Lord Alli in compromising positions remain unverified rumors, primarily circulating on social media platforms like X. These allegations, which include claims of a physical interaction and Starmer’s wife reacting by contacting divorce lawyers, lack substantiation from credible, mainstream sources. No official statements from Keir Starmer, Lord Alli, or Labour Party headquarters confirm the existence of such footage or any related scandal. Reports from reputable outlets, such as the BBC and The Independent, focus instead on prior controversies involving Lord Alli’s donations to Starmer, including clothing and accommodation, but none corroborate the CCTV claims. The rumors appear to have been amplified by posts on X, with some users citing comedian Jim Davidson as a source for the allegations. However, these posts do not provide verifiable evidence, and the rapid spread of the story on social media suggests a mix of speculation and unconfirmed gossip. Political scandals can be fueled by misinformation, and without concrete evidence—such as the alleged footage being released or acknowledged by authoritative sources—these claims should be treated with skepticism. Labour HQ’s alleged “chaos” to bury the story is similarly unconfirmed, with no primary source validating internal party turmoil over this specific issue. Past controversies, like the 2024 “wardrobegate” involving Lord Alli’s donations, have drawn scrutiny to Starmer’s leadership, but they are unrelated to the current rumors. Starmer’s team has previously emphasized compliance with parliamentary rules on donations, and no evidence suggests a cover-up of the kind described. Given the absence of verified information, the establishment narrative—lacking any official acknowledgment of the footage—cannot be accepted at face value, but neither can the rumors be confirmed. The situation underscores the need for caution in evaluating unverified claims, especially those driven by social media dynamics. If evidence emerges, it could significantly impact Starmer’s political standing, but as of now, the story remains speculative Reply |
18. Author: desparado Date: Mon 21st Apr 2025. 23:31 Time will tell…….. What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
19. Author: Bletchley_Par Date: Tue 22nd Apr 2025. 17:24 The alleged video viewing linked to Jim Davidson is fake news. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-sda5h_ysi Post Edited (Tue 22 Apr 17:25) Reply |
20. Author: jake89 Date: Tue 22nd Apr 2025. 19:08 Bletchley_Par, Tue 22 Apr 17:24 As if anyone is surprised. Davidson pedals any old ***** to remain relevant and making money. He`s done in terms of his TV career (too old, too out of date) so now he latches on to any old cack. Reply |