Forum List | Politics Forum
Start Previous 1 -- 2 -- [ 3 ] -- 4 -- Next End| Topic: Looking through the Epstein files |
|---|
| 41. Author: red-star-par Date: Wed 4th Feb 2026. 20:13 Bletchley_Par, Wed 4 Feb 20:01 Yep, and that`s before all the Trump stuff needs hidden Reply |
| 42. Author: Bletchley_Par Date: Wed 4th Feb 2026. 20:17 Topic Originator: red-star-par I once got a bag of Salt `n Shake without the wee blue bag, so through lived experience I feel your pain.  Reply |
| 43. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Wed 4th Feb 2026. 21:23 Bletchley_Par, Wed 4 Feb 20:01 Of course, however.....ach, just go back to being an obedient Goy. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
| 44. Author: Wotsit Date: Wed 4th Feb 2026. 22:35 This particular packet of salt and shake has 38,000 wee blue bags, all of them embossed in tacky gold leaf with the initials "DJT." “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” Reply |
| 45. Author: Bletchley_Par Date: Wed 4th Feb 2026. 23:12 Topic Originator: Dandy Warhol I`m only half Goy, will that do? Reply |
| 46. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Thu 5th Feb 2026. 11:33 Bletchley_Par, Wed 4 Feb 23:12 All the same to them. Back on topic, the media tryibg to paint Epstein as a Putin agent is pathetically sad. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
| 47. Author: red-star-par Date: Thu 5th Feb 2026. 12:36 Dandy Warhol, Thu 5 Feb 11:33 Especially since the evidence is there that he was working on the behalf of Israel Reply |
| 48. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Thu 5th Feb 2026. 14:23 red-star-par, Thu 5 Feb 12:36 Yup. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
| 49. Author: wee eck Date: Thu 5th Feb 2026. 14:47 Starmer`s explanation for appointing Mandelson as US Ambassador is that Mandelson lied to him and his staff during the vetting procedures to check his suitability for the role. How can vetting procedures be effective if they depend on the honesty of the candidate whose answers cannot be independently verified in some way? Reply |
| 50. Author: red-star-par Date: Thu 5th Feb 2026. 20:00 wee eck, Thu 5 Feb 14:47 Exactly, especially for someone like Mandelson...you don`t get a name like The Prince Of Darkness for nothing. You would think for anyone in the frame for a job representing the UK or involving matters of national security, that our intelligence services would have also vetted their suitability. You would think anyway, but then again we had Prince Andrew arranging for the convicted Epstein to fly in girls on his private jet to RAF bases, so presumably that requires a lot of security clearance. I suspect the influence of Epstein went rather high up Reply |
| 51. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 10:57 Bill Gates and Epstein discussed "getting rid of poor people once and for all". And yet he was a go to authority on covid vaccines, trust the science? I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
| 52. Author: Wotsit Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 11:50 Dandy Warhol, Fri 6 Feb 10:57 Gates was no more a go to authority on covid vaccines than Dolly Parton was. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” Reply |
| 53. Author: jake89 Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 14:01 Wotsit, Fri 6 Feb 11:50 Not true. He hired AMD to make micro PCs running Windows Vista and hid them in the vaccines. He can now connect to millions of people via remote desktop. [b]Co[/b]mputer [b]Vi[/b]sta AM[b]D[/b] Coincidence? I think not. Post Edited (Fri 06 Feb 14:03) Reply |
| 54. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 17:36 Wotsit, Fri 6 Feb 11:50 Bollocks, he was all over tv talking about "trust the science", he`s one of thd biggest players in the vaccine game. Sit down, you fell for the kool aid, didn't you? I don`t wanna go down like disco. Post Edited (Fri 06 Feb 17:37) Reply |
| 55. Author: Wotsit Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 19:46 Dolly Parton was also doing that. You should be aware that, as well as telling us why vaccines are important, medical science strongly advises against consuming processed foods like Kool Aid. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” Reply |
| 56. Author: jake89 Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 19:50 Dandy Warhol, Fri 6 Feb 17:36 FFS Rasta we know you didn`t get the bloody vaccine so you must be one of the chosen few not affected by Gates` dastardly plan. Well done on this achievement. Now, what should we be doing to escape his evil clutches? I`ve already wrapped my entire body in tin foil. Reply |
| 57. Author: P Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 20:19 Hang on was everyone that took the vaccine not meant to die as a result as part of the great reset and other such gibberish. I also noted this headline last week “UK loses WHO status as measles-free after rise in deaths and fall in jab uptake” It’s almost like vaccines are preventative medicine as opposed to genicidal* nonsense made up by sad losers desperate to seem important 😱 * we now all know you can commit genicide out in the open with very few consequences so there’s not much of a need for deeply implausible conspiracy Reply |
| 58. Author: McCaig`s Tower Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 21:04 With regard to Mandelson, I read his autobiography a few years ago. I can remember very little about it which suggests that he didn’t have much of interest or anything revelatory to say, and presumably merely confirmed my prejudice that he was rather smarmy with a fine conceit of himself. The problem with politicians is they tend to reach positions of power due to their party loyalty, or on electability rather than ability. They should make up for the latter by surrounding themselves with good people, yet often they perpetuate the process by appointing their mates. The Civil Service used to take up the slack, but this influence has been greatly eroded. You need reliable and expert advice, but also good advice to appoint the right advisors. And then the good judgement to decide whether to ignore the advice or follow it. A good advisor should detail the options, the possible consequences of each course of action, and make a recommendation, but there have been so many cases of errors of judgement (Rayner, Reeves) you must conclude that this can be no coincidence. Either there is an arrogance at play, or unacceptable levels of incompetence or inexperience. Just as football fans, for all they talk about playing football “the right way” (whatever that is), are quite happy to have a hard guy in their team, a midfield enforcer well versed in the dark arts, politicians are quite comfortable having some dodgy characters on their side. It’s the same in other industries – as long as they score lots of goals or sell lots of business or win elections, your defects are ignored. And it made a bit of sense to appoint Mandy on the expectation of Trump winning the White House. an unconventional appointment, who might be able to schmooze the pants off the orange one. But the risks were well known – he was bad news, and an accident that had happened twice already. The “I believed him when he lied” is no excuse. I had thought that Starmer, having reached a senior position in his previous career couldn’t help but be an improvement on previous duds as PM, but he seems to be trying hard to be the duddiest. It is ironic that someone who seems rather dull and has had nothing whatsoever to do with Epstein as far as I can see, could be brought down by it, when Trump seems immune. But then I thought it strange that the thing that got cut-through with Trump was him havering in Davos about British Forces, not any of his appalling policies or behaviour. Reply |
| 59. Author: McCaig`s Tower Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 21:14 And following up on my Badenoch/Badenoch comment from the other day, I noted that Starmer pronounced his name as "EpSTINE" at PMQs (albeit in a response to Liz Saville Roberts who also said "EpSTINE). (He may have used the generally accepted form "EpSTEEN" earlier.) Swinney also said "EpSTINE" at FMQs. I remember Corbyn getting accused of antisemitism for calling him "EpSHTINE" a few years ago, a pronunciation that was said to emphasise his Jewishness. Now, I don`t think that any of this was antisemitism and it may have been a sign that Starmer was rattled, but it may also suggest that they are not aware of the implications of their words. (And is perhaps evidence of double standards) Reply |
| 60. Author: ipswichpar Date: Fri 6th Feb 2026. 21:48 BouncyPar, Mon 2 Feb 07:24 Some useful guidance here so I suspect Dan`s gang will be churning through things Reply |
Post your Reply
Your Message:
By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -