| Topic: Ming Yang |
|---|
| 1. Author: desparado Date: Thu 26th Mar 2026. 22:50 So UK sabotages another project in Scotland. Conveniently making the announcement just as the Scottish parliament breaks up for the election. 18 months UK gov have been dithering on this….then boom cancelled. So much for respecting Scot Gov and promising to be transparent and foster a good working relationship. Aye right. 1500 jobs were going to be created.. Better together eh ? What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
| 2. Author: jake89 Date: Thu 26th Mar 2026. 23:23 The decision may be right but the time taken to decide feels excessive and the timing convenient. Having engaged with a.fair few senior civil servants from London it may well be coincidence though as very few remember Scotland exists or has devolved powers. I wish I was joking. Reply |
| 3. Author: desparado Date: Fri 27th Mar 2026. 06:01 The decision is certainly not right. Ming Yang already operate on projects in England but there somehow a security risk in Scotland ? It stinks….And UK Gov certainly knew when Holyrood went into recess.. What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
| 4. Author: LochgellyAlbert Date: Fri 27th Mar 2026. 13:50 Strange that China can build a "super embassy" and a nuclear power station in England without it being a security risk? Reply |
| 5. Author: desparado Date: Fri 27th Mar 2026. 14:21 Only recently UK Gov were calling the SNP a security risk. They label vandals as terrorists. I would like to hear from the Secretary of State for Scotland explaining why Ming Yang can operate in England but not Scotland. They can’t be a security risk for one project yet not for others.. What an opportunity we missed in 2014. Reply |
| 6. Author: wee eck Date: Fri 27th Mar 2026. 14:49 During the blackout of the internet in Iran there was a marked decline in posts on X which were critical of the monarchy, the Union and Westminster apparently. The recently-published Rycroft Report on foreign influence and interference on UK politics suggested this was indicative of such practices being prevalent in normal circumstances. Should we infer that anybody supporting independence is considered to be an enemy of the state ? Post Edited (Fri 27 Mar 15:03) Reply |
| 7. Author: jake89 Date: Fri 27th Mar 2026. 18:05 X is just filled with nonsense. I saw a post this week showing black people "stealing" water from a marathon. Turned out it was AFTER the marathon and people were told to help themselves. Reply |
| 8. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Sat 28th Mar 2026. 15:59 England are laughing at us. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
| 9. Author: ipswichpar Date: Sat 28th Mar 2026. 18:07 wee eck, Fri 27 Mar 14:49 25% reduction I hear.... I wonder what the reduction would be if Russia and China lost connection. Reply |
| 10. Author: red-star-par Date: Sat 28th Mar 2026. 20:44 ipswichpar, Sat 28 Mar 18:07 There surely can`t be many people in Scotland (who haven`t been brain washed) that are in favour of the monarchy, the union, and Westminster. Sounds like we have taken our foot of the gas if we are letting Iranian bots take the strain, we will need to raise our game When it comes to the monarchy in particular we could do worse than following the example set by the French and the Russians (got to be sure to get rid of all future generations too, so the thieving scum don`t return). Reply |