| Topic: Batten the hatches |
|---|
| 1. Author: jake89 Date: Mon 14th Sep 2026. 18:54 It`s already started. Too wee, too stupid, can`t afford it etc etc. It`s 2014 all over. Just wait for the Israel and Russian bots creating friction. Reply |
| 2. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Mon 14th Sep 2026. 20:29 Its quite funny watching wee Nige getting annoyed at it like his opinion means something. And his sycophant followers saying we are now joining up with the IRA to break apart this glorious Union…….. The same questions will need answered though….. Deficit Defence Economy/Currency EU Membership Although if we return to the EU, does that mean we can send back any small boats trying to dock at Silversands? The good thing is we can send Trident packing down to Devonport, along with the 17 or so rotting Subs in Rosyth/Faslane for them to deal with! Post Edited (Mon 14 Sep 21:09) Reply |
| 3. Author: jake89 Date: Mon 14th Sep 2026. 20:48 The current deficit is already being looked at. It`s likely the driver for getting rid of all the NHS boards and merging some councils. Won`t be popular but the NHS is ridiculously top heavy. So much dead weight. The Sandy Peggie nonsense showed just how poor management is at NHS Fife, for example. Reply |
| 4. Author: NMCmassive Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 01:06 jake89, Mon 14 Sep 18:54 Are we still ignoring the huge number of Iranian bots that support Scottish independence and the fact that some SNP politicians will almost verbatim repeat their talking points? COYP Reply |
| 5. Author: jake89 Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 10:26 Not if you don`t want to. The Iranians are far less prevalent though. Reply |
| 6. Author: NMCmassive Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 13:57 There were over 1300 Iranian bots identified on X alone. Just Iranian and just on X. I’d suggest R/scotland is full of them. Exact same talking points except if you challenge them they’ll tank your karma. r/Scotland is basically unusable because of it. 256 pro-union bot accounts on X. Define less prevalent COYP Reply |
| 7. Author: jake89 Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 17:02 I`ll take your word for it NMC. My socials are now filled with English people ranting about how the other nations need England etc and AI videos stating how much better Scotland is than England. 4-5 years of this. Reply |
| 8. Author: widtink Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 17:36 Dave_1885, Mon 14 Sept 20:29 There are no "rotting" subs in Faslane but I`m assuming you know that. The subs that are based in Faslane are still in service. There are 7 in Rosyth (including the one currently being recycled) , and there is 16 in Devonport. That makes 23 in total. Now , I`m all for us going alone .... What have we got to lose . Id love to see us giving it a good go. But , .... If that was to come to pass do you really think that it would just be a case of "ok royal navy , take all these subs and missiles away" ? There would be a timetable of (at a guess) at least 10 years but more probably 20 for this to happen. It`s not the kind of thing that can be accomplished in a few months. You can bet that the British government and the Scottish government have already had that chat. And then there`s the relocation of Coulport.. That`s another minefield altogether. Hypothetically , yes , the subs at Faslane could all sail south to Devonport but the infrastructure is what takes the time to relocate. Who on earth would want a trident storage facility like Coulport near them ? It certainly won`t be built anywhere near Devonport that`s for sure lol. And if you think that any of the submarines in Rosyth are seaworthy enough to be towed or even piggy backed down to Devonport then I`m afraid you`re very very wrong. The Rosyth subs (all 7 of them ) will be recycled at Rosyth as moving them south simply isn`t possible now. On the upside , ... The 16 subs in Devonport will all be recycled in Devonport. (When they learn about the whole process from the Rosyth test case) currently Swiftsure. Swiftsure is reported to be coming along well and the initial date for completion was supposed to be the end of 2026 although that date was only the recycling end date. You can add another 2 years onto that before it`s really done and dusted. The good old USA and France have been successfully recycling their subs for ages now so I`d assume we have gained some knowledge from them. Hope so anyway. The Russians tried to recycle theirs with catastrophic results until they finally got their act together (international money helped). Prior to that , they had a nasty habit of "accidentally" scuttling/dumping them at sea. 😲 Admin Reply |
| 9. Author: NMCmassive Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 18:20 jake89, Tue 15 Sep 17:02 Don’t take my word for it, have a look for yourself COYP Reply |
| 10. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 20:42 widtink, Tue 15 Sep 17:36 Another defining reason of being “better together” - nukes all stored near our biggest city and ones falling apart across the river from our capital……👌🏻👌🏻 Reply |
| 11. Author: NMCmassive Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 21:37 Honestly, I don’t get the anti nuclear bomb thing. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Until such times as it can be put back, we’re actually safer owning nukes COYP Reply |
| 12. Author: LochgellyAlbert Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 22:13 Is it not the case that the nukes are stored in the depths of Glen Fruin?🤔 Reply |
| 13. Author: P Date: Tue 15th Sep 2026. 22:20 Dave_1885, Tue 15 Sep 20:42 You do know they’ve long long long been defuelled so they no longer contain nuclear fuel? Thats not to detract from a statistically significant pattern of childhood leukaemia/non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Rosyth being higher than average closer to the site than would have been expected but that is probably more to do with Rosyth being a nuclear-submarine refitting facility, and there being radiation exposures among dockyard workers. I asked AI but did not check for hallucinations as it seems reasonable; “Environmental monitoring has generally been reassuring. The latest 2024 RIFE report says direct radiation from the Rosyth site was less than 0.001 mSv for the year, with gamma radiation measurements around the site difficult to distinguish from natural background. “ So in summary ‘ones falling apart across the river’ would seem to be hyperbole. This is not a political point, I just have an aversion to shouting exaggerated nonsense which seems to be how every debate goes these days. Reply |
| 14. Author: widtink Date: Wed 16th Sep 2026. 09:43 LochgellyAlbert, Tue 15 Sept 22:13 As far as I`m aware glen fruin is now only used for training . Glen Douglas on the other hand ... Admin Reply |
| 15. Author: Hoolie Date: Wed 16th Sep 2026. 18:32 Oh FFS…I don’t care anymore as whatever happens it’s the workers that will be taxed to pay for the layabouts and illegals… Reply |