DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Football Forum

     1 -- [ 2 ] -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 --      

Topic: German FA official wants World Cup boycott talks
21. Author:  Big T Par        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 10:16

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 10:11

Big T Par, Sun 25 Jan 09:08

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 01:32

Do you mean the woman in the car? The one that’s currently under investigation? Or the one that’s just happened so there’s no been time for an investigation?


Both. No need for an investigation. The footage for both, tells you the truth.. Murdering cnts


Thankfully we’ve got jury trials and investigations in the western world eh! Otherwise it would be a step backwards towards the 3rd Reich or USSR… both as bad as each other. Pick what one you like!

Here’s an American lawyer breaking down the incident.

https://youtu.be/bDda-L_ZOE8?si=3hw8enOcuj_2sSnm

Here he is comparing Renee Good and Ashli Babbitt

https://youtu.be/UNHiCjwM9tg?si=DeTfvHCrcrx_bjPp

If Links don’t work it’s Nate the Lawyer on YouTube. I like him because he’s very objective and doesn’t let his politics or preconceptions get in his way.


The actual footage.

https://x.com/i/status/2015168034122748031



Post Edited (Sun 25 Jan 10:47)

Reply
22. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 10:21

PARrot, Sun 25 Jan 09:21

brian, Sun 25 Jan 09:18

P so there is evidence of corruption there too ?
as I say, world needs to stand up now

however, I understand that people have booked tickets, flights and accommodation and that is nore of a serious problem as you don`t want them to lose that money. but if Trump is making threats, then the rest of teh world should look at threatening him too.

on the bright side, he is not likely to be in power by the time kick-off comes .o))))


He is planning on declaring a national emergency and cancelling midterm.
He will not give up power. He and Vance and Miller must be removed by any means.


‘Legal experts and analyses emphasize that the U.S. Constitution does not grant the president authority to unilaterally cancel federal elections, as they are administered by states and Congress sets the dates. Any attempt to do so via emergency powers would face significant legal challenges and likely be ruled unconstitutional.’

Doesn’t matter what Trump says. He’s not got the power to do it (typical of Trump actually 🤷🏻‍♂️)

COYP

Reply
23. Author:  Dave_1885        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 10:24

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 10:21

PARrot, Sun 25 Jan 09:21

brian, Sun 25 Jan 09:18

P so there is evidence of corruption there too ?
as I say, world needs to stand up now

however, I understand that people have booked tickets, flights and accommodation and that is nore of a serious problem as you don`t want them to lose that money. but if Trump is making threats, then the rest of teh world should look at threatening him too.

on the bright side, he is not likely to be in power by the time kick-off comes .o))))


He is planning on declaring a national emergency and cancelling midterm.
He will not give up power. He and Vance and Miller must be removed by any means.


‘Legal experts and analyses emphasize that the U.S. Constitution does not grant the president authority to unilaterally cancel federal elections, as they are administered by states and Congress sets the dates. Any attempt to do so via emergency powers would face significant legal challenges and likely be ruled unconstitutional.’

Doesn’t matter what Trump says. He’s not got the power to do it (typical of Trump actually 🤷🏻‍♂️)


The entire premise of ICE is unconstitutional….yet continues to cause utter carnage.

And to think folk will vote for Farage here because he wants to introduce ICE here….

Reply
24. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 10:25

I wasn`t going anyway, but I feel sorry for people who have already spent thousands on tickets and accommodation. Couldn`t pay me to visit the US under that clown.

Reply
25. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 11:16

Big T Par, Sun 25 Jan 10:16

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 10:11

Big T Par, Sun 25 Jan 09:08

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 01:32

Do you mean the woman in the car? The one that’s currently under investigation? Or the one that’s just happened so there’s no been time for an investigation?


Both. No need for an investigation. The footage for both, tells you the truth.. Murdering cnts


Thankfully we’ve got jury trials and investigations in the western world eh! Otherwise it would be a step backwards towards the 3rd Reich or USSR… both as bad as each other. Pick what one you like!

Here’s an American lawyer breaking down the incident.

https://youtu.be/bDda-L_ZOE8?si=3hw8enOcuj_2sSnm

Here he is comparing Renee Good and Ashli Babbitt

https://youtu.be/UNHiCjwM9tg?si=DeTfvHCrcrx_bjPp

If Links don’t work it’s Nate the Lawyer on YouTube. I like him because he’s very objective and doesn’t let his politics or preconceptions get in his way.


The actual footage.

https://x.com/i/status/2015168034122748031


You’ve just posted links to an edited video from an account that claims to be in Beijing and has a banner showing Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Friedrich Engels and Joseph Stalin.

The first question I would ask before looking at any of the content from that account is, do I think this account is going to be honest, impartial and objective? My answer would be no.

The UNEDITED video is there for people to see. They’re adult enough to come to their own conclusions.

Since you’ve skipped over the one that’s being investigated and are bringing up edited videos of the one that’s just happened and obviously hasn’t been investigated yet, I can only conclude that your claim that “they’re getting away with it” isn’t something I can take seriously 🤷🏻‍♂️

COYP

Reply
26. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 11:28

Dave_1885, Sun 25 Jan 10:24

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 10:21

PARrot, Sun 25 Jan 09:21

brian, Sun 25 Jan 09:18

P so there is evidence of corruption there too ?
as I say, world needs to stand up now

however, I understand that people have booked tickets, flights and accommodation and that is nore of a serious problem as you don`t want them to lose that money. but if Trump is making threats, then the rest of teh world should look at threatening him too.

on the bright side, he is not likely to be in power by the time kick-off comes .o))))


He is planning on declaring a national emergency and cancelling midterm.
He will not give up power. He and Vance and Miller must be removed by any means.


‘Legal experts and analyses emphasize that the U.S. Constitution does not grant the president authority to unilaterally cancel federal elections, as they are administered by states and Congress sets the dates. Any attempt to do so via emergency powers would face significant legal challenges and likely be ruled unconstitutional.’

Doesn’t matter what Trump says. He’s not got the power to do it (typical of Trump actually 🤷🏻‍♂️)


The entire premise of ICE is unconstitutional….yet continues to cause utter carnage.

And to think folk will vote for Farage here because he wants to introduce ICE here….


Just asked ChatGPT “is the premise of ICE unconstitutional?”

The short answer is: no — the existence and basic authority of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is not unconstitutional, because it was created by Congress under its constitutional powers over immigration and national security. However, many specific ICE policies and actions have been challenged as unconstitutional, depending on how they’re carried out.

Asked Grok the same question

No, the premise of ICE—meaning the foundational purpose and existence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws—is not unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress broad authority to regulate immigration and naturalization under Article I, Section 8, and the executive branch has the power to enforce those laws. ICE was established by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as part of the Department of Homeland Security, reorganizing functions previously handled by agencies like the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). This legislative creation has not been broadly ruled unconstitutional by courts, and the federal government’s plenary power over immigration has been upheld in numerous Supreme Court decisions, such as in Chae Chan Ping v. United States (1889) and Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972).

We already have the immigration enforcement (IE) which works under the home office banner and was established in 2012.

It’s not a public fronted organisation so it’s not well known but it is there. They’re the folk that are there to try and pick up people who get passed the border force or UK Border agency.

I don’t think they’re doing a particularly good job but I wouldn’t be surprised if like the police, they’re horribly underfunded.

COYP

Reply
27. Author:  Big T Par        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 11:41

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 11:28

Dave_1885, Sun 25 Jan 10:24

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 10:21

PARrot, Sun 25 Jan 09:21

brian, Sun 25 Jan 09:18

P so there is evidence of corruption there too ?
as I say, world needs to stand up now

however, I understand that people have booked tickets, flights and accommodation and that is nore of a serious problem as you don`t want them to lose that money. but if Trump is making threats, then the rest of teh world should look at threatening him too.

on the bright side, he is not likely to be in power by the time kick-off comes .o))))


He is planning on declaring a national emergency and cancelling midterm.
He will not give up power. He and Vance and Miller must be removed by any means.


‘Legal experts and analyses emphasize that the U.S. Constitution does not grant the president authority to unilaterally cancel federal elections, as they are administered by states and Congress sets the dates. Any attempt to do so via emergency powers would face significant legal challenges and likely be ruled unconstitutional.’

Doesn’t matter what Trump says. He’s not got the power to do it (typical of Trump actually 🤷🏻‍♂️)


The entire premise of ICE is unconstitutional….yet continues to cause utter carnage.

And to think folk will vote for Farage here because he wants to introduce ICE here….


Just asked ChatGPT “is the premise of ICE unconstitutional?”

The short answer is: no — the existence and basic authority of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is not unconstitutional, because it was created by Congress under its constitutional powers over immigration and national security. However, many specific ICE policies and actions have been challenged as unconstitutional, depending on how they’re carried out.

Asked Grok the same question

No, the premise of ICE—meaning the foundational purpose and existence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws—is not unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress broad authority to regulate immigration and naturalization under Article I, Section 8, and the executive branch has the power to enforce those laws. ICE was established by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as part of the Department of Homeland Security, reorganizing functions previously handled by agencies like the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). This legislative creation has not been broadly ruled unconstitutional by courts, and the federal government’s plenary power over immigration has been upheld in numerous Supreme Court decisions, such as in Chae Chan Ping v. United States (1889) and Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972).

We already have the immigration enforcement (IE) which works under the home office banner and was established in 2012.

It’s not a public fronted organisation so it’s not well known but it is there. They’re the folk that are there to try and pick up people who get passed the border force or UK Border agency.

I don’t think they’re doing a particularly good job but I wouldn’t be surprised if like the police, they’re horribly underfunded.


Post a link to the "unedited" version then, please



Reply
28. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 12:00

Since you are so keen to dismiss the inconvenient video evidence (which was posted by a number of other sources but is being systematically deleted all over the internet), can I ask what fantasy you could concoct that would make what happened a reasonable action by anyone, least of all secretive government agents?

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

Reply
29. Author:  Dave_1885        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 12:28

Wotsit, Sun 25 Jan 12:00

Since you are so keen to dismiss the inconvenient video evidence (which was posted by a number of other sources but is being systematically deleted all over the internet), can I ask what fantasy you could concoct that would make what happened a reasonable action by anyone, least of all secretive government agents?


Thankfully there are still plenty videos out there that show the true facts of the case.

The fact that Noem has come out and spouted utter bullsh*t to the media (and the world) without hesitation or flinching shows how ingrained this cult is.

Reply
30. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 12:36

Just seen the "pink jacket lady" video.

Seems like Alex Pretti, the victim, was helping a woman who ICE had assaulted previously when they swarmed them, pepper sprayed them both in the face, beat Alex, pistol whipped him, shot him in the head, then dumped about a dozen shots into his lifeless corpse.

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

Reply
31. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 12:42

Wotsit, Sun 25 Jan 12:00

Since you are so keen to dismiss the inconvenient video evidence (which was posted by a number of other sources but is being systematically deleted all over the internet), can I ask what fantasy you could concoct that would make what happened a reasonable action by anyone, least of all secretive government agents?


Honestly what are you on about? 🤣 I’ll dismiss an edited video from a communist account every time. It’s never going to be impartial is it?

What fantasy do you concoct that would make you think an account posting propaganda is going to be a reliable source of information?

I think you and Big T are stuck in the same algorithms

COYP

Reply
32. Author:  red-star-par        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 12:50

NMCmassive, Sun 25 Jan 12:42

Wotsit, Sun 25 Jan 12:00

Since you are so keen to dismiss the inconvenient video evidence (which was posted by a number of other sources but is being systematically deleted all over the internet), can I ask what fantasy you could concoct that would make what happened a reasonable action by anyone, least of all secretive government agents?


Honestly what are you on about? 🤣 I’ll dismiss an edited video from a communist account every time. It’s never going to be impartial is it?

What fantasy do you concoct that would make you think an account posting propaganda is going to be a reliable source of information?

I think you and Big T are stuck in the same algorithms


I`ve seen the video. It`s cold blooded murder. Overkill. The people that did it are utter cowards. If you can`t watch the videos and see anything less than murderous scum then there is something very far wrong with you

Reply
33. Author:  Big T Par        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 12:52

Well post the unedited video and put us right , massive



Post Edited (Sun 25 Jan 12:54)

Reply
34. Author:  Dandy Warhol        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:02

It`s cold blooded murder and frankly, if you are actively admiring of the orange rapey nonce, you need checked.

I don`t wanna go down like disco.

Reply
35. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:06

Who honestly believes it’s a good idea to interrupt an enforcement agency like ICE and physically getting involved with their agents while carrying a gun?

The American courts may well end up prosecuting someone for killing him and it wouldn’t be unjustified but why did he put himself in that situation and why did he think having a gun while doing it would be a good idea?

The ICE agents aren’t innocent but nobody in that footage is.

COYP

Reply
36. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:09

There`s more than one video, filmed from various angles. Some are from the lead up, some show the murder itself, and others show aftermath. It might be the one of the most documented murders in history.

But one of the videos was posted by someone who liked the cut of Karl Marx`s jib, so the cultists think they can ignore it all. What they cannot do is show any evidence that absolves or mitigates what the masked thugs did.

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

Reply
37. Author:  Jealous Furniture        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:32

"Physically getting involved" is one way to put it.

I suppose his second mistake was "physically getting involved" with ten of ICE`s bullets.

People like you make me sick.



Reply
38. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:37

Ahh. "The cult realises it can`t rationalise the crime, so they start blaming the victim."

We`re on a well trodden path.

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

Reply
39. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:39

If you can’t work out why edited footage from a communist is better ignored 🤷🏻‍♂️

That’s on you.

COYP

Reply
40. Author:  NMCmassive        
Date: Sun 25th Jan 2026. 13:40

Jealous Furniture, Sun 25 Jan 13:32

"Physically getting involved" is one way to put it.

I suppose his second mistake was "physically getting involved" with ten of ICE`s bullets.

People like you make me sick.


Yeah, he physically got himself involved 🤷🏻‍♂️ it’s in the footage.

Why was he there in the first place?

COYP

Reply
     1 -- [ 2 ] -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 --      

Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -