Forum List | Off Topic
Start Previous [ 1 ] -- 2 -- Next End| Topic: Prince no more…. |
|---|
| 1. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Thu 30th Oct 2025. 20:41 Andrew Mountbatten Windsor……no longer a Prince. At last! Also, from the Palaces statement, it looked like a small admission of his wrong doing at the end….. Reply |
| 2. Author: red-star-par Date: Thu 30th Oct 2025. 21:04 Mountbatten, that`s some name to make him use, the name of his paedophile uncle. I can only assume there is more to come on this story, that scummy family normally close ranks Reply |
| 3. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Thu 30th Oct 2025. 21:18 There were rumours going about that Charlies health wasn’t improving, so the conspiracy could be that Williams pushed this through. Reply |
| 4. Author: Wotsit Date: Thu 30th Oct 2025. 23:54 Losing a pointless title and moving from one free mansion to another free mansion is not a reasonable punishment for what he did. There should also be an investigation into why his mum used taxpayer money to pay off one of his victims. The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy. Reply |
| 5. Author: Dandy Warhol Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 06:51 He`s a rapist, he should be in jail. I don`t wanna go down like disco. Reply |
| 6. Author: parsfan Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 10:02 red-star-par, Thu 30 Oct 21:04 Like 40 prostitutes in four days on a tax-payer funded trip to Thailand? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The universe is ruled by chance and indifference  Reply |
| 7. Author: NMCmassive Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 10:19 Not being funny but I don’t think he was only involved with prostitutes that were old enough to be prostitutes. I may be wrong but I don’t think I am. I would happily become a republic. If it was just tax dodging then it wouldn’t be so much of an issue but I keep saying it - there’s only one family in the world that had close ties to both Epstein and Saville. That’s only what’s publicly known. COYP Reply |
| 8. Author: Wotsit Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 11:25 So far the RF has paid off a victim to avoid open discussion of the facts in court and has waited until it started to impact the institution as a whole before acting. And when they did act, they basically told the perpetrator that he had to move to a different palace and change his name. It is a rotten institution and it needs to go. The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy. Reply |
| 9. Author: Big T Par Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 11:58 👆Spot on Reply |
| 10. Author: Luxembourg Par Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 12:01 Dandy Warhol, Fri 31 Oct 06:51 [b]allegedly[/b] Wotsit, Thu 30 Oct 23:54 [b]allegedly[/b] I have no time for the sleazy, entitled, arrogant twat - but let’s be real, not convicted in any courts. - But hung dried and quartered on the word of an already well paid, blackmailing ex-prostitute and self-confessed recruiter for Maxwell and Epstein.  Reply |
| 11. Author: parsmad68 Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 13:07 I have a feelings my like one of the posters above. There is more to come. This is being drip fed from somewhere so I wonder how much more they have. Reply |
| 12. Author: Wotsit Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 13:36 Indeed Lux, we are not courts of law, but Andrew is perfectly free to discuss these matters in a court at any time. He seems reluctant though, and in the absence of legal clarification I am going to reach my own conclusion based on the available evidence which points firmly at him being a sweaty nonce who has been protected by a corrupt institution. Saville never had to face a court either, are we supposed to caveat any suggestions that he was an abusive monster too? The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy. Reply |
| 13. Author: Luxembourg Par Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 16:31 Wotsit, Fri 31 Oct 13:36 No arguement there. However, not convicted, or even charged with the alleged crimes. Again, on the word of one deified former hooker and recruiter. Wotsit, Fri 31 Oct 13:36 He managed to die before most of the accusations were out - pretty hard to prosecute a corpse. Reply |
| 14. Author: P Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 16:58 “Again, on the word of one deified former hooker and recruiter.” Why do you not also say ‘alleged’ hooker and recruiter since she was never convicted of anything either or do you hold her to a lesser standard with your thinly veiled contempt? Reply |
| 15. Author: Luxembourg Par Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 17:36 P, Fri 31 Oct 16:58 ‘Self-confessed ex-hooker and recruiter’ better for you? There is no thinly veiled contempt here. Much open contempt for both of them. For all his sleaziness, I don’t believe AMW is a rapist. This self-important, entitled, arrogant scumbag likely held himself in such high regard that it was easy to assume that all these girls were delighted to sleep with him! Remember, he had already been with a number of beauties that wouldn’t have looked at him twice if he were not a prince of the realm. Reply |
| 16. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 17:40 Luxembourg Par, Fri 31 Oct 17:36 Bloody hell 🤦🏻♂️ imagine openly defending a sex trafficker and dirty old man who knew exactly what he was doing by victim blaming. What an absolute low life you are. Hope you don’t have a daughter if thats your views. Reply |
| 17. Author: Luxembourg Par Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 17:58 Dave_1885, Fri 31 Oct 17:40 Defending WHICH sex trafficker? Is that another allegation made at AMW? Dirty old man - yep, fair enough. Victim blaming? Have a word with yourself. A well paid escort/hooker/entertainment paid for and laid on by yet another scumbag is hardly the victim. Low life? Cool - I’ll let you know when I’m back next and you can say that to my face 😚 And yes, I have two daughters - neither of whom would have been allowed to do that ‘work’ - where was her father while this was going on? Oh yeah, working at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago, and got her the job there, where she met Maxwell. Reply |
| 18. Author: wee eck Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 19:04 There`s one thing in particular about this that has puzzled me. In his interview with Emily Maitlis on the BBC Andrew said that on one occasion when it was claimed he was with Virginia Giuffre he was in fact visiting a pizza restaurant in Woking with his two daughters. Surely this alibi would have easy to verify by speaking to the management of the restaurant or tracking down customers of the restaurant on that particular day? They were unlikely to forget if royalty had been present. But no attempt seems to have been made by the media or anyone else to confirm or disprove what Andrew claimed. Reply |
| 19. Author: FifeEternal Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 22:58 Dirty sex case. Should be investigated fully and prosecuted accordingly. New leaks tonight showing he emailed Epstein asking to catch up after his prison release... Probably to silence him for good before Clinton got to him. Unfortunately this will go on forever whenever there is power to be grabbed without consequence. Digital footprints are what started this semi downfall and hopefully continue to do. Reply |
| 20. Author: jake89 Date: Fri 31st Oct 2025. 23:01 Thing is, it`s all allegations but he`s a bloody Royal. If these allegations are coming out then the truth is likely even worse. When you know you`re a person of interest you need to keep your nose clean. Reply |
Post your Reply
Your Message:
By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -