DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Politics Forum

     1 -- [ 2 ] -- 3 --      

Topic: Peter Murrell re-arrested
21. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 18:03

So after 17 years of SNP rule and after the SNP reorganised and approved all the major positions within Police Scotland that same organisation is rife with corruption. Is that the line we are going with?

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
22. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 18:32

All political parties were in favour of the formation of Police Scotland, not just the SNP, and I wasn`t aware the government was involved in the appointment of its officers. No one has mentioned corruption but I`d like to know why it has taken almost three years to charge someone in connection with their investigations. We`re never going to get an objective assessment from the MSM because they`re all against the objectives of he SNP and are quick to publicise any story that shows them in a bad light.



Reply
23. Author:  jake89        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 18:37

Surely people in Fife of all areas aren`t questioning Police Scotland`s ability to be shady as hell?!

Reply
24. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 18:52

Chief Constables are appointed after the approval of the Justice Secretary. The current one was approved by Angela Constance. Corruption is very much like what is being implied here. It` being suggested that the charges against Mundell had been held up so that the court case would conicide with the Holyrood elections in two years time.
I mean I`m still now sure who is behind this supposed conspiracy to frame Mundell. Is it the Tories or is it Labour? Whoever it was how did they manage to pressure the lead detective in this case to dither and pause the investigation so that he could charge Mundell so that it would not only distract from the shenanigans of a couple of Tory MPs (turns out Israel and Iran trading missiles must also be part of this subterfuge) but would also be unwanted coverage during the Scottish elections.
Don`t worry though I`m sure in the weeks and months or even years to come some of the junior officers involved in the case will come forward to detail how they couldn`t understand why their commanding officer wasn`t pressing ahead with the charges sooner. Maybe even the lead detective himself will go public with how one dark,foggy night months earlier as he was getting into his car a figure came out from the shadows and menacingly told him that it would be in his best interests to charge Mundell on the 16th of April.
Of course it`s all just bonkers just like when it was insinuated by some that Sturgeon and her inner circle were behind Salmond being charged over his misdeeds.
Now I have no idea if Mundell is innocent or not of the allegations against him. He gets the benefit of the doubt until the courts say otherwise. Mind you the courts must surely be in on this conspiracy as well so what does it matter.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
25. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 19:31

Mundell?!!! I didn`t realise he was involved or was that a Freudian slip? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚



Reply
26. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 19:52

Indeed Wee Eck πŸ˜‚ Mundell is the Machiavellian figure in the background pulling the strings in all this.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
27. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Fri 19th Apr 2024. 20:06

It`s all beginning to make sense now!

Reply
28. Author:  Parboiled        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 07:36

Poor Humza looked and sounded quite broken yesterday, you would think he was attending his own funeral...one could almost feel sorry for him.



Post Edited (Sat 20 Apr 07:49)

Reply
29. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 08:34

Maybe he has empathy for fellow human beings. It`s a hard concept for Tories to grasp.

Reply
30. Author:  Parboiled        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 10:28

No, he’s a chancer with more faces than a pack of cards



Reply
31. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 10:34

Just as I said...



Reply
32. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 10:59

I never thought it would happen but truly a miracle has occurred on dotnet. Parboiled has managed to type "Humza" rather than "Hamza".

Small steps, small steps...but maybe Tenruh can be convinced to stop referring to nuSNP πŸ˜‚

Reply
33. Author:  ipswichpar        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 11:29

Parboiled, Sat 20 Apr 10:28

No, he’s a chancer with more faces than a pack of cards


I thought I`d accidentally clicked on the Gorgeous George thread....

Reply
34. Author:  Parboiled        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 12:32

New specs needed Jake..never typed that in my puff!



Reply
35. Author:  McCaig`s Tower        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 12:32

All political parties were in favour of the formation of Police Scotland

The Lib Dems voted against, the Tories abstained.



Reply
36. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 13:20

Parboiled, Sat 20 Apr 12:32

New specs needed Jake..never typed that in my puff!


Friday, 8:21am πŸ˜‚

Also, just search it and you'll see it wasn't a one off either.

Post Edited (Sat 20 Apr 13:21)

Reply
37. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 13:36

Aye on the net zero thread. Could have been put down as a simple typo or spell check correction Parboiled but you had to double down and say you`d never typed that in your puff. A resounding W for Jake.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
38. Author:  Parboiled        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 13:52

We have been infiltrated by an impuster



Reply
39. Author:  Raymie the Legend        
Date: Sat 20th Apr 2024. 19:29

.




It`s bloody tough being a legend
Ron Atkinson - 1983


Post Edited (Sat 20 Apr 19:29)

Reply
40. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Sun 21st Apr 2024. 12:36

Seems to be a fair bit of speculation that this isn`t the end of it as far as charges go.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
     1 -- [ 2 ] -- 3 --      

Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -