Topic: Peter Murrell re-arrested |
---|
41. Author: jake89 Date: Sun 21st Apr 2024. 16:58 Anyone truly in the know can`t comment at this time so it`ll just be Michelle on Facebook taking a break from sharing posts about a suspicious man in a white van to post that she heard from her pal whose husband has been watching the Bill since it started that there`s more to come. Reply |
42. Author: LochgellyAlbert Date: Tue 28th May 2024. 23:37 So Rayner exonerated, pity the SNP case was as quickly resolved, wonder why?🤔 Reply |
43. Author: Tenruh Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 06:13 LochgellyAlbert, Tue 28 May 23:37 In her case she was getting smeared by the tories for what she was doing to BJ . The SNP case is based on allegations of fraudulent behaviour towards members and Independence supporters. Reply |
44. Author: Parboiled Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 07:54 Whitabootery is all they have left mate! Reply |
45. Author: sadindiefreak Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 14:46 Parboiled, Wed 29 May 07:54 Still having a conversation with yourself Tenruh/Parboiled. Reply |
46. Author: wee eck Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 15:32 Has anyone ever seen them together in the same room? No? Me neither! Reply |
47. Author: parsfan Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 16:42 wee eck, Wed 29 May 15:32 The tiresome tartan/Tory tag team? Nope. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The universe is ruled by chance and indifference ![]() Reply |
48. Author: Tenruh Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 16:42 Parboiled, Wed 29 May 07:54 Indeed Parbo Indeed Reply |
49. Author: wee eck Date: Wed 29th May 2024. 17:06 Tell the party leaders involved in the general election campaign that `whitabootery` is not on. They`d have nothing to say. Politics is all about choices and I don`t see how you can avoid making comparisons with rival parties and exposing their hypocrisy. Reply |
50. Author: LochgellyAlbert Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 21:25 Mmmmmm!🤔🤠Reply |
51. Author: jake89 Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 21:59 What a surprise. I trust there will be an investigation into the investigation? Reply |
52. Author: Buspasspar Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 22:08 What do you mean you gave it to me? That was the money that she gave to me and I gave it to you to give to him, then you gave it back to me and I had to give it to her to give to him. Was that the money that she gave to him that I gave to you to give to her? Why certainly. Well, if she wants to give it to him, that`s her business. No use you and I arguing about it. We are forever shaped by the Children we once were Reply |
53. Author: wee eck Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 22:10 What`s this all about, guys? I can`t find any breaking news about Peter Murrell. Reply |
54. Author: red-star-par Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 22:35 wee eck, Tue 9 Jul 22:10 Not seen anything about it on any of the British Establishments news outlets, but have seen plenty of comments on Twitter which suggest that the case was dropped by police right after the polls closed due to insufficient evidence Reply |
55. Author: wee eck Date: Tue 9th Jul 2024. 22:41 I thought the police had handed it over to the Procurator Fiscal to decide if there was a case to answer? Reply |