| Topic: Anas Sarwar |
|---|
| 1. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Tue 21st Jul 2026. 23:07 BBC reporting that he is to join the Lords and become a minister in Burnham`s cabinet. Jobs for the boys... Reply |
| 2. Author: NMCmassive Date: Tue 21st Jul 2026. 23:12 My initial thought is as much as it’s jobs for the boys he’s trying to get Sarwar onside as early as possible. Wasn’t Sarwar very outspoken on Starmer? COYP Reply |
| 3. Author: wee eck Date: Tue 21st Jul 2026. 23:38 Maybe this is Sarwar`s reward for starting the ball rolling with criticism of Starmer even before the Holyrood election campaign had begun. I`m not seeing much `new` politics, with supporters of the new PM being elevated to the House of Lords and given a job in government without being elected. That`s one thing the SNP won`t be guilty of doing. Reply |
| 4. Author: The One Who Knocks Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 01:10 Is there any official reason why you have to become a lord to be part of the cabinet? And although my eyes were open They just might as well be closed Reply |
| 5. Author: AdamAntsParsStripe Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 02:01 The One Who Knocks, Wed 22 Jul 01:10 I’m assuming because he’s not an elected MP, Not even an elected MSP either to be fair. Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte ![]() Reply |
| 6. Author: ipswichpar Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 06:31 The best we have to offer, or simply rewarding folk for helping with the political coup? (And that`s coup d`etat rather than a mess.....) Reply |
| 7. Author: red-star-par Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 13:03 I wonder what Joshua Simons, the MP who unselfishly gave up his job so Burnham could get in the back door as PM, managed to get out of that for himself. He wasn`t doing it for the good of the country presumably Reply |
| 8. Author: McCaig`s Tower Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 13:44 Is there any official reason why you have to become a lord to be part of the cabinet? Not legally. it is a convention that any minister be available to answer questions in parliament. It used to be quite rare for someone to be ennobled in such a way to allow inclusion in the cabinet – I think there was a bit of comment when David Young was ennobled in the Thatcher years. Patrick Gordon Walker was made Foreign Secretary in 1964 by Harold Wilson, despite losing his seat at the General Election. It was assumed that he would soon get back into parliament, but he managed to lose the Leyton by-election so quit. Reply |
| 9. Author: McCaig`s Tower Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 14:04 As for Anas Sarwar, it wasn`t that long ago that he looked like becoming First Minister Then the world decided that Starmer wasn`t very good at his job (he wasn`t, although better than several recent incumbents), and was somehow responsible for things like CoVid, Putin invading Ukraine, war in the middle east and the re-election of Trump. (He wasn`t this either). Sarwar has been getting a lot of flak for the insipidness of the Holyrood campaign, but how much of that is justified, and how much is residual bitterness over not being socialist enough is not clear to me. His demise reminds me a little of Aberdeen constantly sacking managers for not winning the league. Who will get his job as leader? Jackie Baillie will be interim leader but I don`t think wants it permanently. I don`t think Daniel Johnson wants it. Monica Lennon will replace him as MSP, she may want the top job as well. Michael Marra is a good MSP - but he may feel he can do more. Paul Sweeney may be a candidate, but choice is limited. Reply |
| 10. Author: wee eck Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 14:07 When politicians are told the public are disillusioned with politics and politicians they always say they `get it` and Burnham said he would change that, but he`s no sooner in the door of no 10 than he`s sacking those in the Cabinet who were close to Starmer and replacing them with his cronies. Now he`s finding a job for someone who isn`t even an MP. Are they so carried away by being in power that they can`t see how this will be perceived or do they simply not give a toss how it looks? It was the same when Starmer came to power and we had all these examples of `freebies` being taken. Could no one in the party or amongst their advisers see the potential damage of this behaviour and nip it in the bud? Post Edited (Wed 22 Jul 14:10) Reply |
| 11. Author: ipswichpar Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 14:26 Given Rayner and Haigh have made a return, I think it`s just that he doesn`t give a toss. Reply |
| 12. Author: MikeyLeonard Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 18:17 MT - when did it ever look like Anas Sarwar was going to be First Minister ?? Did I miss something ? Reply |
| 13. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 21:57 IMO, Sarwar is a really odious individual. Moaning about how high positions in Scotland "are always occupied by white people" and his grievance politics where everyone is supposedly Islamophobic. Also can`t help but find the irony in him being privately schooled, Leader of the Labour Party and now a Lord. Reply |
| 14. Author: Andrew283 Date: Wed 22nd Jul 2026. 22:57 MikeyLeonard, Wed 22 Jul 18:17 Sarwar has never been close to being FM Reply |
| 15. Author: Tenruh Date: Thu 23rd Jul 2026. 06:44 red-star-par, Wed 22 Jul 13:03 Look at his name..... See Burnham has given the Yanks access to British airfields to bomb Iran . Two clues for you. They've totally corrupted politics to the point they're getting away with genocide. Post Edited (Thu 23 Jul 06:46) Reply |
| 16. Author: jake89 Date: Thu 23rd Jul 2026. 09:23 Sarwar is an odious little man. A perfect example of what Labour have become - career driven liars. Him being made a lord after all he said about the Lord`s is surely the final nail in his political career coffin. Except it isn`t as he`s now going to be paid for life for doing sweet FA. Makes you wonder what he did to deserve that? 🤔 Reply |
| 17. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Thu 23rd Jul 2026. 17:33 Named as the UKs head on Trade…….thats questionable. Reply |
| 18. Author: wee eck Date: Thu 23rd Jul 2026. 19:01 In politics it`s amazing how principles go out the window when there`s a possibility of personal advancement. Farage seemed to lose interest in proportional representation when he thought there was a chance of Reform winning a majority under First Past The Post. Reply |
| 19. Author: Andrew283 Date: Thu 23rd Jul 2026. 23:59 Dave_1885, Thu 23 Jul 17:33 It`s about time these positions were specifically for individuals with relevant University education or experience in the field. Cabinet reshuffles have become an absolute joke of inexperience Reply |
| 20. Author: jake89 Date: Fri 24th Jul 2026. 10:13 We now have nearly 800 people in the Lord`s. Each eligible for £370 a day. Although they don`t all show up, that`s almost £300k a DAY or around £60m a year taking into account recess. Why on Earth does a country this size need 800 Lords? Reply |