DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Football Forum

     1 -- 2 -- 3 -- [ 4 ] --      

Topic: Reserve Cup - Pars 3 Falkirk 0
61. Author:  weemike        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:01

Back_oh_the_net, Wed 25 Sept 17:52

wee eck, Wed 25 Sep 17:04

By the way, what was stopping McPake from playing three CBs on Saturday against PT, or in the previous match against the Rovers if he wanted to?


Absolutely nothing wee eck absolutely nothing at all stopping him and that fact that he hasn’t done so shows he’s got players at the back now that he feels comfy enough to play a back 4 but weemike clearly won’t let that get in the way of having a pop at the manager just for the sake of it


Guaranteed we will be back to 3 at the back by the new year.

Reply
62. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:06

You said `first chance he gets`, now it`s 'guaranteed' by the New Year; such remarkable foresight! Maybe it`ll depend on who we`re playing against but who knows for sure?

Post Edited (Wed 25 Sep 18:07)

Reply
63. Author:  weemike        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:25

wee eck, Wed 25 Sept 18:06

You said `first chance he gets`, now it`s `guaranteed` by the New Year; such remarkable foresight! Maybe it`ll depend on who we`re playing against but who knows for sure?


Have you seen us the passed 2 years? His preferred setup is 3 at the back. You`re awfully argumentative.

Reply
64. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:40

It was three at the back until recently. If you post stuff that isn`t accurate you shouldn`t be surprised if people challenge it. Are we all supposed to agree with you automatically? It`s a forum for goodness sake.



Reply
65. Author:  weemike        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:42

wee eck, Wed 25 Sept 18:40

It was three at the back until recently. If you post stuff that isn`t accurate you shouldn`t be surprised if people challenge it. Are we all supposed to agree with you automatically? It`s a forum for goodness sake.


What`s not accurate about the managers preference for 3 at the back? hence why the youth team is still playing that way.

Reply
66. Author:  da_no_1        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:44

weemike, Wed 25 Sept 18:42

wee eck, Wed 25 Sept 18:40

It was three at the back until recently. If you post stuff that isn`t accurate you shouldn`t be surprised if people challenge it. Are we all supposed to agree with you automatically? It`s a forum for goodness sake.


What`s not accurate about the managers preference for 3 at the back? hence why the youth team is still playing that way.


Maybe 3 at the back suits that team and the personnel available. Nothing wrong with that formation if you have suitable players

"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"

Reply
67. Author:  wee eck        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:46

Do you actually read other folks` posts? If you don`t accept what I`ve posted read Back oh the net`s post at 17.52.



Reply
68. Author:  weemike        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 18:58

wee eck, Wed 25 Sept 18:46

Do you actually read other folks` posts? If you don`t accept what I`ve posted read Back oh the net`s post at 17.52.


Accept what? That we played four at the back for 2 games in a row.

I`d be very surprised if we went the rest of the season without 3 at the back being our main lineup.

As I`ve said before, the manager prefers it. And if it gets results, there is nothing wrong with it.

Someone asked why is the reserves playing 3 at the back when the first team is playing four.

To summerise.

4 at the back is a temporary solution to our loss of form. I believe the manager will revert us back to 3 at the back as soon as he can.

Post Edited (Wed 25 Sep 19:04)

Reply
69. Author:  Dave_1885        
Date: Wed 25th Sep 2024. 23:18

Despise F*lkirk and their fans and the fact McGlynns got away scot free with signing Goodwillie in his previous role - but fair play to them for still being unbeaten (league wise) and getting through in cup - we could have done with that large pay packet they will have got from a game at Parkhead.

On that though, they didn’t look overwhelmingly great against us earlier in the year, but shows how poor we have started this season.

Reply
70. Author:  veteraneastender        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 10:15

"You`re a better man than the vast majority on both sides including me.

Fk them. And McGlynn the rape apologist. And their horrible fans."

Vast majority ? How do you come to that conclusion ?

You can`t brand all fans of a club based on the behaviour of a relatively small bunch of numpties.

We have a similar group that fall into the same category unfortunately.



Reply
71. Author:  da_no_1        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 11:35

Right, first of all my post you quoted was a bit extreme, apologies if I've offended any Pars fans who have Falkirk as their other team. Thoughts and prayers etc.....

Secondly, yes I guarantee 100% that the vast majority of our fans would rather Falkirk got beat every week rather than remain invincible for the rest of the season unlike our friend weemike.

Thirdly......who you calling a numpty? 😄

"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"

Post Edited (Thu 26 Sep 11:36)

Reply
72. Author:  weemike        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 11:42

da_no_1, Thu 26 Sept

Secondly, yes I guarantee 100% that the vast majority of our fans would rather Falkirk got beat every week rather than remain invincible for the rest of the season unlike our friend weemike.

I`d rather they got hammered every week and went str8 back down.

But it`s highly unlikely.

Reply
73. Author:  Wotsit        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 11:51

Ideally I`d want Falkirk to do slightly worse than the Pars every season. Tugging at our coat tails and keeping us on our toes, but always falling slightly short.

The enemy travels by private jet, not by dinghy.

Reply
74. Author:  veteraneastender        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 14:23

da_no_1, Thu 26 Sep 11:35

Right, first of all my post you quoted was a bit extreme, apologies if I`ve offended any Pars fans who have Falkirk as their other team. Thoughts and prayers etc.....

Secondly, yes I guarantee 100% that the vast majority of our fans would rather Falkirk got beat every week rather than remain invincible for the rest of the season unlike our friend weemike.

Thirdly......who you calling a numpty? 😄


I was exorcised of any “other team” clandestine affiliations in the Middle Ages, although I do like to see the Wasps doing well, just a local weakness.

I would think that all Pars fans are comfortable when Falkirk draw, or better still lose !!!

Ref. the final response - if you tell us your real world name…………..!!!

😊

Reply
75. Author:  shellypar        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 14:56

Wotsit, Thu 26 Sept 11:51

Ideally I`d want Falkirk to do slightly worse than the Pars every season. Tugging at our coat tails and keeping us on our toes, but always falling slightly short.


As long as we beat them everytimee we play and finish above them im happy

COYP

Reply
76. Author:  da_no_1        
Date: Thu 26th Sep 2024. 15:29

veteraneastender, Thu 26 Sept 14:23

da_no_1, Thu 26 Sep 11:35

Right, first of all my post you quoted was a bit extreme, apologies if I`ve offended any Pars fans who have Falkirk as their other team. Thoughts and prayers etc.....

Secondly, yes I guarantee 100% that the vast majority of our fans would rather Falkirk got beat every week rather than remain invincible for the rest of the season unlike our friend weemike.

Thirdly......who you calling a numpty? 😄


I was exorcised of any “other team” clandestine affiliations in the Middle Ages, although I do like to see the Wasps doing well, just a local weakness.

I would think that all Pars fans are comfortable when Falkirk draw, or better still lose !!!

Ref. the final response - if you tell us your real world name…………..!!!

😊


In my profile mate. No hiding behind .net profiles for me

"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"

Reply
     1 -- 2 -- 3 -- [ 4 ] --      

Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -