DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Football Forum

     1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 -- 6 -- [ 7 ] -- 8 -- 9 -- 10 -- 11 -- 12 --      

Topic: Hamilton Could be docked points update - docked -15 points
121. Author:  87Par        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 20:11

Genuinely feel we would`ve stayed up anyway. The fact this has came along is a huge bonus. Couldn`t give a flying eff about other teams. They`ve done something against the rules and thats how it rolls. Still need to treat games as if this hasn`t happened though. With Lenny at the wheel I doubt the foot will be taken off the gas. Maybe see the players playing with a bit more flare if anything.

Reply
122. Author:  AdamAntsParsStripe        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 20:15

To me it changes nothing other than we avoid automatic relegation. We still have the business to do of winning one game from three and would prefer it was this Saturday rather than facing Airdrie or Morton

Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte


Reply
123. Author:  red-star-par        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 20:24

I remember maybe a decade ago visiting a financial adviser through in Hamilton and he said that it was pretty common knowledge that there was a lot of very dodgy financial goings-on at the club. I think at that time they had just sold Tony Andreu to Norwich and there was much hoo-ha over the fee which seemed a bit over inflated. From him there was plenty of allegations that the club was being used as a money laundering front for local gangsters. They then had that whole thing where they were defrauded for about a million, pretty much gave it away to someone. I think there is a lot going on behind the scenes at Hamilton that perhaps isn`t strictly above board.

Having said all that, I`m hoping Lennon has printed off the league table from yesterday, as I wouldn`t count our chickens that an appeal won`t wipe this deduction. I think we need to play our remaining games based on the table as it was. I don`t think Lennon will allow the players to ease off thinking it`s job done, as there is still a lot of work to do

Reply
124. Author:  Angus_W        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 20:39

Lennon should be asking for 40pts from his team…….

See who wants to be here next season.

“.........it ain’t over till the Pars score!”

Reply
125. Author:  TroonPar        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 21:47

This in The Scotsman website: -

Hamilton Accies respond to charges

A statement from Hamilton Accies after the sanctions were announced read: "We are astonished and disappointed at the Tribunal decision we have received this evening. We are awaiting the written reasons whereupon the Board will meet to consider an appeal.

"We would ask that all fans continue their excellent support of the players on the pitch, and the management team in the dugout, as we enter the final stages of the season. Until any appeal process is concluded we shall be making no further comment."

Bill Kinnear

Reply
126. Author:  Parsfangaz        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 22:56

Socks, Wed 16 Apr 23:32

The licensing downgrade is separate to the issues around the ground. I haven`t seen any official comment from either Hamilton or the SPFL but the talk of points deductions is to do with the licensing issue and it`s because Bonnyrigg were deducted 6 points earlier in the season when their license was also downgraded from bronze to entry.

With Bonnyrigg, the reason for the downgrade was an issue with the ground. With Hamilton, it`s not. Their ground is listed as `silver`. It`s on `first team` criteria that they`ve been dropped to entry level.

It`s late in the season, but this has been going on for ages. I found some of the earlier lists of awards from this season and most clubs in this division were initially audited in September. Some, including Hamilton and the Pars, had further reviews in November, presumably to follow up on certain issues. Most were resolved at that time, including ours being downgraded from silver to bronze, also on first team criteria. The lists showed Hamilton`s award still not having been decided at that stage, with further reviews in December. In March, theirs was finalised as only meeting requirements for entry license. One list showed it as subject to appeal, and another list was later published with that asterisk removed.

I assume the hearing tomorrow is going to deal with this. It is now a requirement of all SPFL clubs to maintain at least bronze license and so the fact that they haven`t means they have breached league rules. I don`t see how that can be contested. The SPFL now need to consider what sanction is appropriate, if any. It`s not certain there will be a points deduction and, if there is, it`s not certain it will be 6. To some degree, it will depend on circumstances.

It`s possible it will also look at the separate issues with the ground. The ground issues are to do with them not confirming their ground for next season by the deadline of 31 March, and possibly also whether they have the necessary security to play there at all. There seems to have been some admin issue that meant they returned the forms slightly late. If this is part of what the hearing is about, and it was just a matter of submitting forms a couple of days late, it would be ridiculous for there to be any significant penalty for that if they can find some mitigation for it.

My guess is that it will deal only with the licensing issue, with any ground-related matters to be looked at later if at all. The licensing issue is what needs dealt with now, as any points deductions have to be sorted out very soon. And since it`s been going on since September, there absolutely does need to be a final outcome to it before the end of the season.


🙄😆 guid story though

Reply
127. Author:  Socks        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 23:20

The first charge is an absolute shocker - it reads that they`ve deliberately lied or given other falsified evidence to get a transfer embargo lifted. Obviously, that led to them having advantages they should not have been entitled to in terms of the players they had available this season. The penalty for that absolutely does need to be severe and 12 points does not seem harsh at all to me.

Although a big deduction was probably justified, and I`m glad that we might benefit from it, I feel really sad for the Accies fans. There`s obviously a lot going on there, but if that was us I`d feel devastated. Imagine being [almost certainly] relegated on a Thursday afternoon as a result of a tribunal decision where you had no idea the charge was that serious. Horrible.



Reply
128. Author:  Bertie Paton        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 23:23

The appeal will go nowhere.

Hamilton fans have been calling out dodgy dealings with their owners for ages.

Their owners have screwed them over. Nowhere to go now. They are stuck with guys like Scott Robinson, 33 years old and on a 2 and a half year contract.

Real threat to the clubs future now.



Reply
129. Author:  Socks        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 23:27

`guid story though`

Most of what I said was pretty much right, though? The licensing issue was the third charge and there was a 3-point deduction for it. The issue with the ground was the fourth charge, and there was a suspended fine (so basically no sanction) for that. All pretty much in line with what I said.

The main one on the first charge was a total unknown. I certainly didn`t expect that. But I was on about the licensing and ground issues, which people were getting mixed up with.



Reply
130. Author:  Parsfangaz        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 23:31

Socks, Thu 17 Apr 23:27

`guid story though`

Most of what I said was pretty much right, though? The licensing issue was the third charge and there was a 3-point deduction for it. The issue with the ground was the fourth charge, and there was a suspended fine (so basically no sanction) for that. All pretty much in line with what I said.

The main one on the first charge was a total unknown. I certainly didn`t expect that. But I was on about the licensing and ground issues, which people were getting mixed up with.


Have a night aff min,

Post Edited (Thu 17 Apr 23:33)

Reply
131. Author:  da_no_1        
Date: Thu 17th Apr 2025. 23:49

From what? Sensible factual posts?

"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"

Reply
132. Author:  LochgellyAlbert        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 00:00

SFA dealt with NW section indiscretions yet, or is that why we have been downgraded?

Reply
133. Author:  DBA        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 00:29

Parsfangaz, Thu 17 Apr 23:31

Socks, Thu 17 Apr 23:27

`guid story though`

Most of what I said was pretty much right, though? The licensing issue was the third charge and there was a 3-point deduction for it. The issue with the ground was the fourth charge, and there was a suspended fine (so basically no sanction) for that. All pretty much in line with what I said.

The main one on the first charge was a total unknown. I certainly didn`t expect that. But I was on about the licensing and ground issues, which people were getting mixed up with.


Have a night aff min,


Pot, meet Kettle.

Reply
134. Author:  PARrot        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 04:01

kozmasrightfoot, Thu 17 Apr 18:56

I`m one for of unfortunate humans that suffers from excess empathy so it`s a weird feeling being happy for us but sad for the Hamilton fans. I`d much rather we stayed up on merit by getting enough points in our last 3 games.

How would you feel? Sitting in 7th place with 3 games to go then BOOM! 15 point deduction and almost guaranteed relegation. I`m happy that we`re pretty much safe, but I`m in no mood for celebrating.

I know that others would laugh if it was us, but I`m not them. I remember what happened to us not that long ago and it wasn`t a nice feeling.

I`d imagine that any appeal would have to happen in the next week or 2? You can`t unrelegate/unpromote a team ffs.


Impressed.



Reply
135. Author:  cammypar 1995        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 08:04

Massive let off but we still have work to do. Doesn`t change anything regarding the lack of quality on the pitch over the course of the season and hopefully we address that over the summer break. Hopefully we can secure safety and start planning for next season in the championship by getting Mullen signed up on that 1 year option.

c'mon the pars

Reply
136. Author:  Rusty Shackleford        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 08:12

I`d rather read a contribution from Socks any day of the week.

Reply
137. Author:  Rusty Shackleford        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 08:12

cammypar 1995, Fri 18 Apr 08:04

Massive let off but we still have work to do. Doesn`t change anything regarding the lack of quality on the pitch over the course of the season and hopefully we address that over the summer break. Hopefully we can secure safety and start planning for next season in the championship by getting Mullen signed up on that 1 year option.


Totally

Reply
138. Author:  par-ticular        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 08:13

To clear a wee point up !
My partner comes from Airdrie, her brother in law supports Airdrie. Don’t ever tell them they’re part of Glasgow. Just as I don’t consider Inverkeithing part of Dunfermline!

Reply
139. Author:  da_no_1        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 08:43

It`s not a "let off" if you consider, from reading the SPFL report, not paying players, and lying about paying them to get the a transfer embargo lifted, they deserve it.

They`ve tried to cheat to stay up.

"Some days will stay a 1000 years, some pass like the flash of a spark"

Reply
140. Author:  parsfan97        
Date: Fri 18th Apr 2025. 09:06

Where’s the left off exactly? We were 5 clear of automatic relegation with 3 to go. Of course work still to be done but to say we are only avoiding automatic relegation cause of this is laughable



Reply
     1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 -- 6 -- [ 7 ] -- 8 -- 9 -- 10 -- 11 -- 12 --      

Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -