Forum List | Football Forum
Start Previous 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 -- 6 -- 7 -- 8 -- 9 -- [ 10 ] -- 11 -- 12 -- Next End| Topic: Mcpake stay? Or Go?? |
|---|
| 181. Author: GJS93 Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 20:19 "go get Murray" why would he accept it? "A better manager will get better results with this group." the odd result here or there maybe but definitely not on a consistent basis. our supposed best 11 is nowhere near the level required, i dont see another couple of signings changing that either. Post Edited (Sat 24 Aug 20:21) Reply |
| 182. Author: weemike Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 20:24 GJS93, Sat 24 Aug 20:19 I disagree. Our best 11 is good enough to compete in this league. A Mcpake coached 11 cannot even beat Cove or Forfar at home. A Mcpake 11 is going to end up marooned at the bottom by Xmas. Reply |
| 183. Author: Alter Ego Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 20:27 He has to go with his defensive style of football..Dundee fans did warn us of this and we are brutal to watch…. Mon the Pars! Reply |
| 184. Author: parsfan97 Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 20:37 Mcpake has to go! Football is utter garbage to watch and we get no results from his ‘style’ of football Reply |
| 185. Author: mars par Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 20:57 Go 5 at the back wasn`t working last season, changed to 4 and it improved us but here he is sticking to 5 at the back and failing with players he has picked for that formation His defensive mindset sacrifices an attacking threat but he still somehow has a poor defensive setup. It`s not working and he doesn`t have a plan B Reply |
| 186. Author: Ahoy!Ahoy! Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 20:59 McPake sets up defensively to not lose a game a sneak a goal. Done the same in league one when we won the league, we weren’t hammering teams we were getting wins by the odd goal. Now we’re setting up not to lose and not even creating any chances so what’s the point. Team feels so flat and we need some change to boost the place and I feel that the only way to achieve this now is change the manager. The players we have we should have a good enough squad to be performing a lot better and scoring plenty goals…all down to the management approach to games. Reply |
| 187. Author: wee eck Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 21:18 As has been said elsewhere, we played with two CBs today and have done so a few times this season so the poor performances can`t really be put down to formation. Reply |
| 188. Author: the saline hill puma Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 21:32 wee eck, Sat 24 Aug 21:18 We played 2cbs doesn`t mean we played 4 at the back. Was definitely a 3 Reply |
| 189. Author: weemike Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 21:38 the saline hill puma, Sat 24 Aug 21:32 I think the confusion is probably because it might be a hybrid of 3 at the back out of possession, 4 at the back in possession. The trouble is when periods of possession only last 10 or 15 seconds. It`s yo-yoing Reply |
| 190. Author: saltonsgonagetu Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 21:43 3 at the back 4 at the back ,it`s garbage .  Reply |
| 191. Author: the saline hill puma Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 21:45 saltonsgonagetu, Sat 24 Aug 21:43 Agree, doesn`t matter when we have no aggression or pace to our play. We are weak and easy to play against Reply |
| 192. Author: saltonsgonagetu Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 21:46 We have been garbage to watch since he came in , excused for the league 1 debacle Reply |
| 193. Author: NMCmassive Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 22:45 Alter Ego, Sat 24 Aug 20:27 Funny how it’s going almost exactly the same way as Dundee. Good start, gets young boys playing well, won a promotion then just everything starts drying out and eventually collapsing COYP Reply |
| 194. Author: Athletico Date: Sat 24th Aug 2024. 23:27 I`ve been a McPake fan, defended him more than once, but 6 defeats and 1 goal for, is inexcusable. But he won`t go. Not in the position the club is now. The current owners won`t pay him off, why would they? They have no interest in spending any more money. Reply |
| 195. Author: NMCmassive Date: Sun 25th Aug 2024. 00:34 Athletico, Sat 24 Aug 23:27 I’m in a very similar group to you. Defended him more than once, I think the reason there was so much attention on the board is the amount of people who defended him but it’s a results business and the results are no longer there. Performances have totally disappeared as well. A hammering from Ayr and he’ll probably be gone, failing that defeat from the lang toun tinks will probably finish it off COYP Reply |
| 196. Author: Higgys Mohawk Date: Sun 25th Aug 2024. 01:28 McPake has to go. Feel like we’ll get relegated without even scoring a goal with his tactics. Reply |
| 197. Author: cammypar 1995 Date: Sun 25th Aug 2024. 07:32 Whoever takes over surely can`t offer contracts to players like wighton Mehmet and co. c'mon the pars Reply |
| 198. Author: Berkey Date: Sun 25th Aug 2024. 07:37 When the other team score first we’re done and the heads go down, we’re looking nailed on for relegation at this point and the leaders in the team already posted missing. Only way to turn this around is a new manager. Although looks like current board are giving what’s left of the budget to mcpake to sign up more central defenders. Anything that could go wrong has gone wrong. Cammy new manager stuck with mehmet until 2026. Players like wighton will be playing for a contract so might start to do us a turn. Theres not many in our team who if we let go would be able to stay in full time football. The post below replying to me is by one of .nets finest champions of mediocrity! Reply |
| 199. Author: Higgys Mohawk Date: Sun 25th Aug 2024. 12:01 It’s looking like he will take us down if he stays. Pretty much been outplayed by every team we’ve faced this year. Reply |
| 200. Author: Bannockburn Par Date: Sat 28th Sep 2024. 16:23 Not changed my mind…should be out tonight. We are heading down to league one. New manager and ideas badly needed. Reply |
This thread has been closed
- - -