Topic: Trump |
---|
61. Author: Bletchley_Par Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:04 If science can`t stand up to scepticism, then it`s not really science, it a faith. Ukraine won`t be joining NATO, they`ve lost the war and will have to concede territory. The USA is NATO.....Pars pro toto. ![]() Reply |
62. Author: Andrew283 Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:11 Bletchley_Par, Fri 14 Feb 21:04 What scepticism? Interesting they`ve lost a war whilst occupying Russian territory... NATO would do perfectly alright without the US. If they also want to continue acting hostile, Europe should consider them as such. Reply |
63. Author: Bletchley_Par Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:16 And the other countries are only paying that much because Trump made them. ![]() Reply |
64. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:33 Once again we see Bletchley avoiding the question with regard to Science. And what you`ve said basically shows that you have ZERO understanding of how Scientific research groups actually function. Quite normal for narcissists like yourself and Trump to avoid saying "I don`t know" at all costs, because to do so would be a massive loss of face to the image-obsessed mind. I actually agree that Europe should do FAR more for it`s defense and, collectively, should have a larger military than the US. The US and Germany should have done a deal far earlier to get the Leopard IIs and F16s in there. The sad thing is that US, French, German and UK air power could have put the Ukraine war to bed quite easily. Funny though how Trump and Vance claim to be protecting Democracy and Free speech yet the guy wants to make pals with Putin and Xi who are vehemently opposed to just that. They seem quite content to let Y`all Qaeda Christian Nationalists run the show. Reply |
65. Author: Bletchley_Par Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:58 Topic Originator: hurricane_jimmy You and I shall never debate anything on these boards, ever. The closest you will get to that eventuality is to continue your current policy of posting ad hominem attacks. I do not care what names you call me, nothing will make me lower my standards of decorum for debate even if you ever posted something that interested me, which you haven`t, ever. ![]() Reply |
66. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:07 You`re right Bletchley, simply due to the fact that you constantly post conjecture. And it`s blatantly obvious to everyone that you refuse to engage in debate because you simply don`t have the knowledge, which is why you never address the points made to you. You`re a narcissist who is either convinced he is/pretending to be enlightened! 😂 Reply |
67. Author: The One Who Knocks Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:29 You`re being trolled HJ. Like the 1980s classic movie Wargames taught us `the only way to win is not to play `. And although my eyes were open They just might as well be closed Reply |
68. Author: red-star-par Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:40 It`s actually difficult to know how to engage with people who are on a part of the spectrum which means that they are potentially incapable of demonstrating feelings and emotional responses on a normal human scale Reply |
69. Author: hurricane_jimmy Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:42 Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯 Reply |
70. Author: jake89 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 09:20 hurricane_jimmy, Fri 14 Feb 22:42 The moon landing was 100% fake. If they could achieve it with a tinfoil spacecraft run using the computing power of a BBC Micro, why has no-one ever done it again? Reply |
71. Author: parsfan Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 11:25 jake89, Sat 15 Feb 09:20 No one`s ever done anything again since the last time someone did it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The universe is ruled by chance and indifference ![]() Reply |
72. Author: AdamAntsParsStripe Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 11:31 jake89, Sat 15 Feb 09:20 There were 5 more manned moon landings though. Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte ![]() Reply |
73. Author: jake89 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 12:07 AdamAntsParsStripe, Sat 15 Feb 11:31 By NASA. All 12 to have allegedly landed on the moon were NASA astronauts. They did 5 missions in 3 years and then stopped. Why? It cost a lot but 50 years later with 50 years of discoveries and tech it should be much cheaper and easier. Why stop? Reply |
74. Author: Andrew283 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 12:12 jake89, Sat 15 Feb 12:07 Because the moon is functionally valueless and there are better things to put resources towards? Reply |
75. Author: Dave_1885 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 13:44 It was a show of power during the cold war, not really been a need to go back since. Also, there is no way on earth you keep thousands of employees silent for decades about it. Just like people claiming the covid is a worldwide conspiracy, when governments cant even agree on the colour of s$$$e, let alone that sort of cover up! Vance is really stepping up the rhetoric though with his claiming that Europe is Europes biggest enemy. Not that Russia would manage to dominate the NATO nations without the US, given they can barely take over the Ukraine. And don’t think the US people would take too kindly to the US siding with Putin and declaring war on Western Europe. Reply |
76. Author: ipswichpar Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 15:25 Europe to be excluded from the talk with Russia. I wonder if Vlad still has some footage containing Trump? Reply |
77. Author: Andrew283 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 16:19 Asking Zeleinski to sign a document giving the Yanks 50% of all Ukrainian minerals for nothing in return 😂 The arrogance is impressive. Reply |
78. Author: jake89 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 18:45 Vance genuinely believes the Scottish government can enforce people praying in their own homes. He`s a complete and utter idiot much like most involved with Trump. Trump is 100% compromised. It`s blatant. Those thinking he`s all for America need to realise he is potentially their biggest enemy. Reply |
79. Author: ipswichpar Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 19:04 I`ve just asked Gemini and it says.... Yes, people in Scotland can pray in their own home. Recent discussions around the introduction of buffer zones around abortion clinics have led to some misinformation. However, the law does not prohibit anyone from praying within their own homes. Misinformation indeed.... Reply |
80. Author: jake89 Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 19:49 ipswichpar, Sat 15 Feb 19:04 No, but, yeah, but, no because that big man in America said so. Reply |