DAFC.net
Login:

password:  
  



Forum List | Politics Forum

     1 -- 2 -- 3 -- [ 4 ] -- 5 -- 6 -- 7 -- 8 -- 9 -- 10 -- 11 -- 12 -- 13 --      

Topic: Trump
61. Author:  Bletchley_Par        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:04

If science can`t stand up to scepticism, then it`s not really science, it a faith.

Ukraine won`t be joining NATO, they`ve lost the war and will have to concede territory.

The USA is NATO.....Pars pro toto.




Reply
62. Author:  Andrew283        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:11

Bletchley_Par, Fri 14 Feb 21:04

If science can`t stand up to scepticism, then it`s not really science, it a faith.

Ukraine won`t be joining NATO, they`ve lost the war and will have to concede territory.

The USA is NATO.....Pars pro toto.


What scepticism?

Interesting they`ve lost a war whilst occupying Russian territory...

NATO would do perfectly alright without the US. If they also want to continue acting hostile, Europe should consider them as such.

Reply
63. Author:  Bletchley_Par        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:16



And the other countries are only paying that much because Trump made them.




Reply
64. Author:  hurricane_jimmy        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:33

Once again we see Bletchley avoiding the question with regard to Science. And what you`ve said basically shows that you have ZERO understanding of how Scientific research groups actually function.

Quite normal for narcissists like yourself and Trump to avoid saying "I don`t know" at all costs, because to do so would be a massive loss of face to the image-obsessed mind.

I actually agree that Europe should do FAR more for it`s defense and, collectively, should have a larger military than the US. The US and Germany should have done a deal far earlier to get the Leopard IIs and F16s in there. The sad thing is that US, French, German and UK air power could have put the Ukraine war to bed quite easily.

Funny though how Trump and Vance claim to be protecting Democracy and Free speech yet the guy wants to make pals with Putin and Xi who are vehemently opposed to just that. They seem quite content to let Y`all Qaeda Christian Nationalists run the show.

Reply
65. Author:  Bletchley_Par        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 21:58

Topic Originator: hurricane_jimmy


You and I shall never debate anything on these boards, ever.

The closest you will get to that eventuality is to continue your current policy of posting ad hominem attacks.

I do not care what names you call me, nothing will make me lower my standards of decorum for debate even if you ever posted something that interested me, which you haven`t, ever.




Reply
66. Author:  hurricane_jimmy        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:07

You`re right Bletchley, simply due to the fact that you constantly post conjecture. And it`s blatantly obvious to everyone that you refuse to engage in debate because you simply don`t have the knowledge, which is why you never address the points made to you. You`re a narcissist who is either convinced he is/pretending to be enlightened! 😂

Reply
67. Author:  The One Who Knocks        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:29

You`re being trolled HJ. Like the 1980s classic movie Wargames taught us `the only way to win is not to play `.

And although my eyes were open
They just might as well be closed


Reply
68. Author:  red-star-par        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:40

It`s actually difficult to know how to engage with people who are on a part of the spectrum which means that they are potentially incapable of demonstrating feelings and emotional responses on a normal human scale

Reply
69. Author:  hurricane_jimmy        
Date: Fri 14th Feb 2025. 22:42

Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯

Reply
70. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 09:20

hurricane_jimmy, Fri 14 Feb 22:42

Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯


The moon landing was 100% fake. If they could achieve it with a tinfoil spacecraft run using the computing power of a BBC Micro, why has no-one ever done it again?

Reply
71. Author:  parsfan        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 11:25

jake89, Sat 15 Feb 09:20

hurricane_jimmy, Fri 14 Feb 22:42

Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯


The moon landing was 100% fake. If they could achieve it with a tinfoil spacecraft run using the computing power of a BBC Micro, why has no-one ever done it again?


No one`s ever done anything again since the last time someone did it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The universe is ruled by chance and indifference





Reply
72. Author:  AdamAntsParsStripe        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 11:31

jake89, Sat 15 Feb 09:20

hurricane_jimmy, Fri 14 Feb 22:42

Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯


The moon landing was 100% fake. If they could achieve it with a tinfoil spacecraft run using the computing power of a BBC Micro, why has no-one ever done it again?


There were 5 more manned moon landings though.

Zwei Pints Bier und ein Päckchen Chips bitte


Reply
73. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 12:07

AdamAntsParsStripe, Sat 15 Feb 11:31

jake89, Sat 15 Feb 09:20

hurricane_jimmy, Fri 14 Feb 22:42

Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯


The moon landing was 100% fake. If they could achieve it with a tinfoil spacecraft run using the computing power of a BBC Micro, why has no-one ever done it again?


There were 5 more manned moon landings though.


By NASA. All 12 to have allegedly landed on the moon were NASA astronauts. They did 5 missions in 3 years and then stopped. Why? It cost a lot but 50 years later with 50 years of discoveries and tech it should be much cheaper and easier. Why stop?

Reply
74. Author:  Andrew283        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 12:12

jake89, Sat 15 Feb 12:07

AdamAntsParsStripe, Sat 15 Feb 11:31

jake89, Sat 15 Feb 09:20

hurricane_jimmy, Fri 14 Feb 22:42

Quite possibly TOWK, but I think you`d be surprised how daft some folk actually are. This week my boss here in HK told me that America faked the Moon Landing and China apparently proved it. Her basis of this theory was simply because she saw the film Fly Me To The Moon! 🤯


The moon landing was 100% fake. If they could achieve it with a tinfoil spacecraft run using the computing power of a BBC Micro, why has no-one ever done it again?


There were 5 more manned moon landings though.


By NASA. All 12 to have allegedly landed on the moon were NASA astronauts. They did 5 missions in 3 years and then stopped. Why? It cost a lot but 50 years later with 50 years of discoveries and tech it should be much cheaper and easier. Why stop?


Because the moon is functionally valueless and there are better things to put resources towards?

Reply
75. Author:  Dave_1885        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 13:44

It was a show of power during the cold war, not really been a need to go back since. Also, there is no way on earth you keep thousands of employees silent for decades about it.

Just like people claiming the covid is a worldwide conspiracy, when governments cant even agree on the colour of s$$$e, let alone that sort of cover up!

Vance is really stepping up the rhetoric though with his claiming that Europe is Europes biggest enemy. Not that Russia would manage to dominate the NATO nations without the US, given they can barely take over the Ukraine. And don’t think the US people would take too kindly to the US siding with Putin and declaring war on Western Europe.

Reply
76. Author:  ipswichpar        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 15:25

Europe to be excluded from the talk with Russia. I wonder if Vlad still has some footage containing Trump?

Reply
77. Author:  Andrew283        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 16:19

Asking Zeleinski to sign a document giving the Yanks 50% of all Ukrainian minerals for nothing in return 😂

The arrogance is impressive.

Reply
78. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 18:45

Vance genuinely believes the Scottish government can enforce people praying in their own homes. He`s a complete and utter idiot much like most involved with Trump.

Trump is 100% compromised. It`s blatant. Those thinking he`s all for America need to realise he is potentially their biggest enemy.

Reply
79. Author:  ipswichpar        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 19:04

I`ve just asked Gemini and it says....

Yes, people in Scotland can pray in their own home. Recent discussions around the introduction of buffer zones around abortion clinics have led to some misinformation. However, the law does not prohibit anyone from praying within their own homes.

Misinformation indeed.... 

Reply
80. Author:  jake89        
Date: Sat 15th Feb 2025. 19:49

ipswichpar, Sat 15 Feb 19:04

I`ve just asked Gemini and it says....

Yes, people in Scotland can pray in their own home. Recent discussions around the introduction of buffer zones around abortion clinics have led to some misinformation. However, the law does not prohibit anyone from praying within their own homes.

Misinformation indeed.... 


No, but, yeah, but, no because that big man in America said so.

Reply
     1 -- 2 -- 3 -- [ 4 ] -- 5 -- 6 -- 7 -- 8 -- 9 -- 10 -- 11 -- 12 -- 13 --      

Post your Reply

Your Message:  


By using your account you have implicitly accepted the DAFC.net Forum Rules and agree to be bound by them. You also agree that you will take sole responsibility for your post and indemnify dafc.net on all matters and costs. Refrain from making any potentially libelous comments about anyone
- - -